MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/54: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
There's absolutely no point in forcing a second proposal, just vote on the appropriate option above and state your reasoning as you did here. The proposal seems to have an overwhelming consensus now, but there's the '''''remote''''' possibility of it changing by the proposal's end. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 23:29, July 21, 2019 (EDT) | There's absolutely no point in forcing a second proposal, just vote on the appropriate option above and state your reasoning as you did here. The proposal seems to have an overwhelming consensus now, but there's the '''''remote''''' possibility of it changing by the proposal's end. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 23:29, July 21, 2019 (EDT) | ||
===Add template for ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate''{{'}}s moves=== | |||
{{ProposalOutcome|blue|canceled by the administrators}}<small>Creation of such a template does not need a proposal.</small> | |||
I've noticed that previous ''Super Smash Bros.'' games have templates leading to the characters' special moves, as well as universal techniques like air dodging, footstool jumping, and tether recoveries. It's been more than 7 months since ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' - the most recent ''Smash'' game - was released, yet we still don't have a templates dedicated to its characters' moves. I'd like to change that. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|MarioManiac1981}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': July 29, 2019, 23:59 (GMT) | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|MarioManiac1981}} Per proposal. Just wanted to bring this to everyone's attention. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
#{{User|Lord Grammaticus}} - Per Doomhiker's comment. | |||
#{{User|TheDarkStar}} - This proposal is completely unnecessary. The other games have a template like this, so why should it be any different here? | |||
====Comments==== | |||
This really does not need a proposal. All other ''Smash'' games have a template like this, and it should automatically should be no different for ''Ultimate''. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 19:36, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:Seconded - This is s the sort of thing you bring up on a talk page before forcing yet another proposal. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 19:51, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::Yeah, the template can just be made. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 19:52, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::Agreed, this proposal is completely unnecessary. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 20:23, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
btw opposes mean you don't want the template to exist in the first place, so that's kind of conflicting with your comments. I can probably just cancel this outright, but I want to see what MarioManiac says first. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:13, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:More of an opposition to the proposal itself than the proposed move - which, as you mentioned, can be made or at least discussed without a proposal. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 21:17, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::You would not even need to discuss it, as it is like giving new games nav templates once they have enough subjects: it is something that is traditionally done so it should be automatically done without discussion or proposal. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 21:36, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::Which is me point, yes. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 21:52, July 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::::Yes, just cancel it. [[User:MarioManiac1981|MarioManiac1981]] ([[User talk:MarioManiac1981|talk]]) 8:45, July 23, 2019 (EST) |
Revision as of 21:53, July 23, 2019
Add RARS to Template:RatingsTemplate:ProposalOutcome RARS is Russian Age Rating System. There are already Mario games that have been classified by this system. So why not add it to the template? Sorry for my bad English. Update: Looks like we need to add GRAC and GSRR too. Proposer: Revilime (talk) Support
OpposeCommentsHow isn't it distinct from it? -- FanOfYoshi 12:12, July 12, 2019 (EDT)
RARS was created in 2012. So, only games released after that have RARS rating, I think.-- Reviilime (talk · edits) 12:36, July 12, 2019 (EDT)
Reviilime (talk · edits) 13:01, July 12, 2019 (EDT) @FanOfYoshi heh I appreciate inputting my name in Cyrillic but ignoring that Baby Luigi is actually called Малыш Луиджи, my name romanized would actually be spelled Бейби Луиджи. It was pretty close though! Ray Trace(T|C) 14:09, July 16, 2019 (EDT) Create a Mario Party 11 redirectTemplate:ProposalOutcome This may sound kind of stupid, but I'm sure that there are people out there who'll automatically assume that Super Mario Party is called Mario Party 11. Super Mario Party is the eleventh Mario Party title to come out on a home console, and thus, when compared to the overall Mario Party series of 25 games, it's the 11th main game, due to the other 14 installments being either handheld or arcade. Harkening to the Mario Kart games, Super Mario Kart-Mario Kart Wii have redirects numbered 1-6. If the first six Mario Kart games warrant numbered redirects, then I really don't see why Super Mario Party cannot be treated in the same manner. Proposer: MarioManiac1981 (talk) Support
OpposeCommentsHere's the proposal in question in case anyone wants to view it before voting here. (T|C) 00:08, July 14, 2019 (EDT) Super Mario Party does refer to itself as "the 11th party" in-game. Scrooge200 (talk) 00:14, July 14, 2019 (EDT)
Create articles for the worlds in Dr. Mario WorldTemplate:ProposalOutcomeA proposal regarding creation of the levels is still underway. That being said, this is a much more clear-cut situation and does not need a proposal, as the stages would have to be covered somehow. After looking at the above proposal, knowing that Dr. Mario World simply doesn't warrant articles for each of its worlds, we'd might as well get the game's worlds themselves covered. Each of Dr. Mario World's levels don't have much information to about themselves, but the worlds as a whole have a lot more that can be brought up about them. Kinda like five sticks being tied together being stronger than each individual stick. 'Nuff said, the above proposal and the opinions of Toadette the Achiever and Mario JC back this proposal up. Proposer: MarioManiac1981 (talk) Support
Oppose
CommentsThere's absolutely no point in forcing a second proposal, just vote on the appropriate option above and state your reasoning as you did here. The proposal seems to have an overwhelming consensus now, but there's the remote possibility of it changing by the proposal's end. -- Lord G. matters. 23:29, July 21, 2019 (EDT) Add template for Super Smash Bros. Ultimate's movesTemplate:ProposalOutcomeCreation of such a template does not need a proposal. I've noticed that previous Super Smash Bros. games have templates leading to the characters' special moves, as well as universal techniques like air dodging, footstool jumping, and tether recoveries. It's been more than 7 months since Super Smash Bros. Ultimate - the most recent Smash game - was released, yet we still don't have a templates dedicated to its characters' moves. I'd like to change that. Proposer: MarioManiac1981 (talk) Support
Oppose
CommentsThis really does not need a proposal. All other Smash games have a template like this, and it should automatically should be no different for Ultimate. Doomhiker (talk) 19:36, July 22, 2019 (EDT)
btw opposes mean you don't want the template to exist in the first place, so that's kind of conflicting with your comments. I can probably just cancel this outright, but I want to see what MarioManiac says first. 21:13, July 22, 2019 (EDT)
|