User talk:Camwood777

From the Super Mario Wiki

Ha ha! I chose 777 because is is both the number of God and considered 'lucky'. Hey, if you need simple help, I may be able to help you. But you may be better off contacting an administrator or bureaucrat. DarkBowserBIS.pngDarkBowser777(talk)Dreamy Bowser idle.png 20:25, 13 August 2017 (EDT)

RE: Trivia[edit]

It's not that trivia is outlawed on the wiki, it's just where possible we do try to incorporate trivia into the main body of the article. I do apologise if my summary came off bad or rude towards you. Personally, I felt the Super Mario RPG part fitted well in the intro, hence why I thought it should stay there. But in all honesty, the second point probably is better of as a trivia point. Yoshi876 (talk)

RE: Spotlight[edit]

Will certainly take a look at including Skillit in a future edition, thanks for the suggestion. As for the Oxford comma, do you have a forum account? If you do, then I'd suggest starting a discussion here. If not, just let me know, and I'll start it for you. Yoshi876 (talk)

No worries, I'll start a discussion soon for you. Yoshi876 (talk)

Shiny enemies[edit]

In regards to this proposal, may I ask why you support giving the paper enemies separate articles but not the shiny enemies? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:58, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

May I ask why splitting the shiny variants would be too much? Keep in mind we have already split pages like Gritty Goomba and Gritty Goomba, among others, due to the two species having different appearances and different stats. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 19:03, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
We don't necessarily need a monolithic, set-in-stone policy page to decide how things work; a policy page won't be able to cover every single nuance in the games, especially as the franchise comes up with new ideas and throws new gimmicks at us. At the same time, through proposals like these, we can create a precedent that can then be followed for future articles. Proposals give us freedom that a policy page may not give us. With that in mind, we've already had proposals that decided to not merge the Gritty Goombas and not merge the "R" version of enemies, so I don't see why this should be any different. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 19:13, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

Tips for Proposal[edit]

Hello. When making a talk page proposal, please remember to add the {{TPP}} template to the top of the section. Also, TPP's end two weeks after the proposal's start. Regular proposals on the main page end after one week. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 14:04, 16 September 2017 (EDT)

Re: Nerd rage[edit]

It's a simple mistake on my bit, I'm not too familiar with the subject but the important part is that we will be theming Issue 128 on 2D Mario games. Meta Knight (talk) 01:16, 17 September 2017 (EDT)

RE: Yes, it's Cam again (shroom spotlight?)[edit]

Don't worry it's not annoying in the slightest :) Sadly, it was too late to include in this edition of Spotlight, all of our focuses were already decided upon, but we will take a lot at it for our November issue, October is usually a themed one. Yoshi876 (talk)

Skillit[edit]

Hello! What information is needed for the Skillit article? I have easy access to the game, so I could probably find more information on him if I know what is needed. --FlameChompNSMBW.pngTheFlameChomp (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2017 (EDT)

Ok, I will try to find some more information (though it may be a few days, as I'm busy at the moment). I don't really think it needs more information about his personality; from what I remember about him, I feel that part is complete.--FlameChompNSMBW.pngTheFlameChomp (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

Re: Question[edit]

Hello!

I used this website to create the picrosses. Once they're generated, I used Snipping Tool to get a picture of them, and then I cropped and recoloured them in paint.NET. Sometimes the website makes mistakes when generating the puzzle, so I had to check over them to make sure the answer and the puzzle match up. If not, I just edit the numbers to make it match. Feel free to ask about anything else! UserPyroGuy.png (T · C) 17:19, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

The website doesn't generate a solution for you; instead, you'll have to Snipping Tool the original puzzle you drew, then paste that on top of the puzzle to get a cohesive solution. Have fun. UserPyroGuy.png (T · C) 10:49, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

Re: Question[edit]

Hello!

Your entire application is sent through a forum PM, as well as future submissions, so you can just submit your images in the same PM making a note of which image is which and things like that. For example, when I first applied I had my image I wanted in standard coding, and provided image links and/or the image itself outside the demo portion of the application but within the same PM. If you need anything else let me know, and I'm glad to see you're interested in writing! Meta Knight (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

Proposals[edit]

Pardon me for bothering, but I've responded to several of the concerns that you raised on a couple of proposals: removing rule 4 and deleting the Minor NPCs category. I'd appreciate it if you could respond to them whenever you're able to. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 12:11, 10 October 2017 (EDT)

This ain't clutter; it's Fun Stuff![edit]

LB fun stuff.png
Hey there, Camwood777!

This is Lord Bowser, giving you a heads-up that your section(s) are due by November 14th. Please PM me your completed section on the forums by then. If you need an extension, don't be afraid to ask for one, though please try to do so in good time.

Please keep a copy of your section saved and on you in case of technical difficulties. If you have any other questions or concerns, feel free to contact me, and I will respond back to you as soon as I can, doing my best to solve your issues.

Take your time on your section(s), though please keep your deadline in mind as you do so. Late sections will not be accepted without a valid reason. Thank you, and I look forward to your writing!

Yours truly,
LB
MI121-lb.png

Sorry for the lateness, I'll be more lenient on deadlines this time around cause of it. Thanks! LBsig.png LB (talkeditsforum) 00:39, 10 November 2017 (EST)

Rocky Wrench[edit]

Currently, Rocky Wrench is said to be a derivative of Monty Mole. Since we don't separate "versions" of these, this is saying that the mole and turtle are related. However, it is also saying that Rocky Wrench is based off of an enemy that wouldn't appear for four years, which makes no sense. I'm trying to rectify that. Also, a bat is related to a sea slug, which is even further apart from this, and I see no complaining about that from anyone. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:38, 9 May 2018 (EDT)