Talk:Game Boy Color: Difference between revisions
(→Oppose) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
====Keep but mention it on the Game Boy's page==== | |||
====Full oppose==== | |||
====Waiting for changes==== | |||
#{{User|Results May Vary}} - The Game Boy Color, while similar, is defined as the '''successor''' to the Game Boy, not a variant. If we merged the two, we would basically treat the Game Boy Color as a variant, which it is not. The Game Boy Color has several ''Mario'' games for it as well, and some of the earlier ones are cross-compatible with original Game Boy units. The Game Boy Color also has its own peripherals, unique BIOS, and some other original details (take the [[Game Boy Horror]] for instance). So no, this would basically bloat the Game Boy article and make it user-unfriendly. Strong oppose. | #{{User|Results May Vary}} - The Game Boy Color, while similar, is defined as the '''successor''' to the Game Boy, not a variant. If we merged the two, we would basically treat the Game Boy Color as a variant, which it is not. The Game Boy Color has several ''Mario'' games for it as well, and some of the earlier ones are cross-compatible with original Game Boy units. The Game Boy Color also has its own peripherals, unique BIOS, and some other original details (take the [[Game Boy Horror]] for instance). So no, this would basically bloat the Game Boy article and make it user-unfriendly. Strong oppose. | ||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} This proposal is completely missing the point of why and how we split and merge consoles. It has nothing to do with system specifications or marketing, the Game Boy Color has exclusive Mario games that can only be played on it, so it gets an article. This is also why we have an article for the DSi but not, say, the New 3DS. | #{{User|Waluigi Time}} This proposal is completely missing the point of why and how we split and merge consoles. It has nothing to do with system specifications or marketing, the Game Boy Color has exclusive Mario games that can only be played on it, so it gets an article. This is also why we have an article for the DSi but not, say, the New 3DS. | ||
Revision as of 01:53, June 18, 2020
Since we cover the Conker series a little bit here, shouldn't Conker's Pocket Tales go in the game gallery? Fawfulfury65
Why just this game? How about the other Conker games? 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 22:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Um... I don't know. The only other one is Bad Fur Day. Yeah, if the game does belong in the gallery, that must mean that Bad Fur Day can go in the N64 article too. And then there's the Banjo series... Fawfulfury65
We have to be consistent. If we are going to add one game from the series, we better add the rest. 
Ray Trace(T|C)
I know, I will do that if I am able to add Conker's Pocket Tales. I just want to make sure it's fine with everyone else. Fawfulfury65
Fine by me. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Buttons
The buttons for the GBC aren't really visable. They're just black. Can someone fix it? 
Master Koopakid
Move your mouse icon thingie over the image, and it shows whether is is A or B.--
Smileymiley5001
13:25, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
Merge with Game Boy
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, April 28, 2024, 19:04 GMT
Nintendo markets this system as a model of the Game Boy other than a new handheld. Sure, the same goes for the Nintendo DSi, but the DSi has a camera, a new OS, a shop, DSiWare, no GBA slot, and a higher resolution. The only things different between the GBP and GBC are the color LCD and exclusive games (including the Printer and Camera).
Proposer: Octoling Rendezvous (talk)
Deadline: July 1, 2020, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Octoling Rendezvous (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose
Keep but mention it on the Game Boy's page
Full oppose
Waiting for changes
- Results May Vary (talk) - The Game Boy Color, while similar, is defined as the successor to the Game Boy, not a variant. If we merged the two, we would basically treat the Game Boy Color as a variant, which it is not. The Game Boy Color has several Mario games for it as well, and some of the earlier ones are cross-compatible with original Game Boy units. The Game Boy Color also has its own peripherals, unique BIOS, and some other original details (take the Game Boy Horror for instance). So no, this would basically bloat the Game Boy article and make it user-unfriendly. Strong oppose.
- Waluigi Time (talk) This proposal is completely missing the point of why and how we split and merge consoles. It has nothing to do with system specifications or marketing, the Game Boy Color has exclusive Mario games that can only be played on it, so it gets an article. This is also why we have an article for the DSi but not, say, the New 3DS.
- Mario Sakuraba (talk) Results May Vary and Waluigi Time make a very good point, and it is also way too much to be merged into one article.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Alex95 (talk) - Per all.
- Duckfan77 (talk) Per all.
- Metalex123 (talk) Per all.
- TheDarkStar (talk) - per all
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Different generation, mostly different games, no more similar than the Game Boy and original Game Boy Advance. Also, you're not putting enough stock in how important the color is. That was a major thing for a handheld to be able to do back then.
- Scrooge200 (talk) This is nonsense. Per all.
- JoeRunner (talk) Per all.
- DarkNight (talk) Per all.
Comments
- Waluigi Time, some games are exclusive to the New 3DS and does not have a separate page. Nintendo and SSBB also market them the same, and they run the same game files. It is NOT a successor.
Octoling Rendezvous 01:51, June 18, 2020 (EDT)
