Talk:Swoop

MKWii

click! In the Wario's Gold Mine section you can see the Swoopers in the tunnel.Darth waluigi 19:34, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

SMG and SMG2

According to Wikipedia Japan, the enemy you have listed here for SMG and SMG2 isn't a Swooper but a different enemy called バットン Batton. Those icy ones from SMG are listed as アイスバットン Ice Batton. In the SMG2 Prima guide, they're listed as just Bat. Vent 14:48, 28 May 2012 (EDT)

Pat the Bat

They don't really resemble Swoopers, and they also fly haphazardly rather than do the expected "swoop", so they're probably supposed to be new enemies like the Evil Coin. (In addition, the above section mentions that the bats in the Galaxy games aren't called Swoopers - maybe someone should take another look at that.) LinkTheLefty (talk) 23:46, 10 October 2014 (EDT)

Split Swooper and Pat the Bat into separate articles

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

no quorum 3-0

It seems the idea that Pat the Bat may have been a misnamed Swoop(er) comes from here, but as mentioned above, Pat the Bat doesn't really resemble Swooper except they're both bats.

Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: December 21, 2014, 23:59 GMT.

Support

1. LinkTheLefty (talk) Per proposal.
2. Mario (talk) Pat the Bat is the only enemy that doesn't share the name as the other Mario enemies in the link, so I say we split. The only thing they have in common is that they're bats.
3. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Per all. The name difference is fairly drastic and they don't look that much like each other.

Split Swooper and Pat the Bat into separate articles redux

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

split 6-0

See above for reasons; it was short one vote, but I'm giving it another chance to reach an actual conclusion.

Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: January 5, 2015, 23:59 GMT.

Support

1. LinkTheLefty (talk) Per proposal.
2. Magikrazy (talk) Per proposal. I find it weird nobody cares about this (although the large amount of Talk Page Proposals recently might be the reason).
3. Walkazo (talk) - Seems like it was a case of jamming in the info wherever it'd fit to avoid making a "stub". Anyway, a separate short article would be better better than the mismatched merge we have here now: per proposal.
4. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Once again per all.
5. Mario (talk) I'm not repeating myself.
6. Kart Player 2011 (talk) per all.

Swoops

Where'd that name come from, and was it used in their latest appearance? The article isn't too clear on that (or I'm reading it wrong). Lord G. matters. 17:49, 4 February 2015 (EST)

Mario Party: Island Tour, but that was all. Template:Color-link-piped _{At last, the rock fell.}

15:05, 22 February 2015 (EST)

And more, according to this. LinkTheLefty (talk) 15:14, 8 May 2015 (EDT)

Move to Swoop

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

move 4-0

"Swooper" has only been used in Super Mario World and the first three Paper Mario games to my knowledge, while "Swoop" is unambiguously the modern name, being used in more recent games (and I'm pretty sure it's policy to use the most recent names).

Proposer: Binarystep (talk)
Deadline: May 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Binarystep (talk) Per proposal.
2. ShyGuy8 (talk) Per proposal
3. Magikrazy (talk) Not really necessary, but since you're doing it, I might as well support it.
4. Burningdragon25 (talk) I will support this one! Let's move it!

Comments

If it's the more recent name, make the move. It's policy to do so. Making a proposal's entirely unneeded and unnecessarily prolongs it. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

The main reasons I'm doing it this way are so there's a clear explanation of the move on the talkpage to prevent someone from just moving it back immediately, and to confirm with 100% certainty that they weren't repeatedly called Swoopers in some recent thing I was unaware of. Binarystep (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2015 (EDT)

All you really had to do was make the move and add a citation for the new name. The log and the article will both have a clear explanation, and considering the numerous examples you brought up to Swooper being an old name, I don't think there would be much room for debate. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Split Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2 info into "Bat (Super Mario Galaxy)"

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, May 2, 2024, 00:00 GMT

From what I've seen, in all relevant languages, the enemy in the Galaxy games is named differently, being named generically bat. It also looks nothing like Swoop(er)s, having big bulgy ringed glowing eyes instead of Swoop(er)'s signature squint. It appears to be based more off of the Keese that appeared in Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess than any iteration of Swoop. There is about as much or possibly less in common between Swoops and Bats (Super Mario Galaxy) than between Rocky Wrench and Monty (Super Mario Galaxy) appearance-wise, and as such they should be split too.

Now I'll run through some potential opposition:

"Plenty of SMG enemies used very different designs than before, like Mechakoopa, Urchin, Porcupuffer, Koopa Troopa, Torpedo Ted, Sliding Stone, Micro Goomba, Tox Box, Amp, Scuttlebug..."
Most of these enemies hadn't appeared in a mainstream Mario game in years, and many not in 3D models ever. They had to make the models from scratch, and as such things were redesigned somewhat. Koopa Troopa was on all fours so it would have a reasonable hitbox, since every enemy from Galaxy seems supersized in comparison to normal; for all the evidence I need for that, look at the enormous Troopas in Super Mario 3D Land. Tox Box had a slightly different Japanese name from before. Urchin wouldn't receive their current design until New Super Mario Bros. Wii. And for all of them, supplementary materials in at least one language still identify them as the enemies from the other games they represent.

"People will be looking for them in the Swoop article."
And people will be looking for Monty (Super Mario Galaxy) in the Rocky Wrench article. Which last I checked, was a tad unhelpful of a page in regards to locating the other, only having it under "related species." Also, people may look for Undergrunt in Monty Mole, but at least it lists that sufficiently.

"The internal filename is the same as Swoop's."
And probably early in development, when they first saved the file, they intended for it to be Swoop, but later decided to do something different. The official Japanese name listed in official guides, including the most recent ones, is Batton. Having the same name in a place people aren't intended to see it means nothing.

"There's no reason for them to make a new enemy with the same attack pattern."
My, the existence of the Monty (Super Mario Galaxy) article is giving me so much counterargument material! And what about other bats with similar behaviors?

"The "Bat" name is wrong because Prima gets É̸͠V̛E͠͞R͏̧Y̴͞͡T̀͞H̷̡́I̡͟͞N͠͡G͠ wrong."
Strawman argument, the name is different in all languages. And no they don't. And official word is official word.

I think that about covers it. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 01:56, 20 September 2017 (EDT)

Proposer: Doc von Schmeltwick (talk)
Deadline: October 4, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Niiue (talk) Per proposal.
2. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose

1. LinkTheLefty (talk) One problem - the internal object name "BasaBasa" carried over to the sequel. I think if Nintendo wanted to fix the filenames, they had a nearly three-years window of opportunity to do so, so the intentions are clear in my opinion. There is the argument that we shouldn't consider unseen material such as filenames as the basis for valid information, but that's also asking for the majority of pre-release and unused content articles to be delegitimized, not to mention development names are already acceptable under naming policy. All in all, I'd rather we stick to what closest matches the game data over go into a guessing game as to why the developers labeled it the same as Swoop, and I believe that is what's currently represented in the article.

Comments

I don't think that your fourth counteropposition argument works, as the bats you mention are less ambiguously different from Swoops. P.S., Fangs actually attack by aimlessly traveling in sinusoidal patterns hoping to bump into Yoshi, a behavior that Swoops lack. ^(T|C) 19:23, 20 September 2017 (EDT)

And Bats from Galaxy fly around aimlessly and deliberately chase. Besides, many enemies in Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island and the rest of the Yoshi series act different. Not to mention that Goombas sometimes chase and sometimes don't, default Bullet Bills may or may not chase, Pokey's had all sorts of inconsistencies...But the bats I listed look about as similar to Swoops as Galaxy Bats do. ie, they don't look similar. I didn't bring up D-Bat, Kobatto, and Minicula. And Fang patterns actually seem to vary by individual. And even if that half of the fourth point doesn't work, the Rocky Wrench/Monty (Super Mario Galaxy) argument still does.Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2017 (EDT)

You forgot your own vote Doc. SmokedChili (talk) 07:47, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

I want to add, if the split succeeds, I'd recommend classifying it as a derived species instead of a related species at the very least, due to the internal name. LinkTheLefty (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

Would it be possible to compare the model names of various entities that have appeared in both Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2 to see if/how they have changed? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 16:42, 21 September 2017 (EDT)