Talk:Round Goomba: Difference between revisions
m (→Support: v073) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Merge [[Round Goomba]] with [[Goomba]]== | ==Merge [[Round Goomba]] with [[Goomba]]== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
<span style="color:Green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">Merge 15-7</span> | |||
"Round Goombas" are just the same as Goombas, except that they are yellow and rounder. They attack exactly the same as normal Goombas too. The name "Round Goomba" isn't even official. So I say we should merge [[Round Goomba]] with [[Goomba]]. | "Round Goombas" are just the same as Goombas, except that they are yellow and rounder. They attack exactly the same as normal Goombas too. The name "Round Goomba" isn't even official. So I say we should merge [[Round Goomba]] with [[Goomba]]. | ||
{{scroll box|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario jc}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|Mario jc}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': June 19, 2011, 23:59 GMT | '''Deadline''': June 19, 2011, 23:59 GMT | ||
Line 66: | Line 69: | ||
*facepalm* I guess were just gonna have to wait until someone makes a proposal {{User|yoshiyoshiyoshi}} | *facepalm* I guess were just gonna have to wait until someone makes a proposal {{User|yoshiyoshiyoshi}} | ||
}} |
Revision as of 22:23, June 19, 2011
Shouldn't this be merged with the Goomba article itself? They're exactly like Goombas except they're yellow and rounder. Mario JC
They don't even have an official name, so I strongly agree with merging this article too Goomba.--Knife (talk) 15:51, 4 June 2011 (EDT)
Merge Round Goomba with Goomba
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
Merge 15-7
"Round Goombas" are just the same as Goombas, except that they are yellow and rounder. They attack exactly the same as normal Goombas too. The name "Round Goomba" isn't even official. So I say we should merge Round Goomba with Goomba.
Proposer: Mario jc (talk) Support
Oppose
CommentsThey also look sililar to Chibibos, those small, round Goombas from Super Mario Land. rend (talk) (edits) @ThirdMarioBro the difference is that the Goomba's from Super Mario World have a different Japanese name Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) @Opposers: Yes we have articles for sub-species, but all of those sub-species have official names. "Round Goombas" are exactly the same as regular Goombas with a few physical differences. We don't have separate articles for the different colored Shy Guys, do we? Please, rethink your votes.--Knife (talk) 15:59, 5 June 2011 (EDT)
Again, those subjects deserve articles because they have official names. Not too sure about Giant Ninjis, but I believe that too is unofficial.--Knife (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
I know this isn't related to the proposal, but... didn't we have an article about this a few years ago, when I was still an addicted-to-SMG 8 year old? It was called "Short Goomba" or something... this might just be deja vu, though.ThirdMarioBro (talk) I say in the Super Mario Galaxy section, it should go like this in one paragraph:
Or something like that. --PyroGuy6 File:Sad Paragoomba.PNG I gotta vacuum tonight. File:ShiggyYakuman.gif 10:38, 10 June 2011 (EDT) @GoombaShoe15 We do need to make those pages. We have pages for Grand Goombas and Gargantua Koopa Troopas Again those have official names the others do not Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) What if hammer bros didnt have official names? should we merge it with koopa? yoshiyoshiyoshi (talk) Yes and thats irrelevant because they do have official names Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
|