Talk:Frying Pan

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frying Pan article. It is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Comments such as "Mario is my favorite character" are not allowed and will be removed on sight. Please use the Mario Boards or our Discord server to talk about Frying Pan.

If you do have a question or comment about the article, please remember to sign your edit with ~~~~.

Scope?[edit]

? Block from Super Mario World This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Apparently, there was a proposal from 1.5 years ago to merge Peach's frying pan to this article. However, one problem that seems to have come from it is that this page seems to be a little unfocused in scope.

Most of the information is centered around Peach's frying pan and adjacent subjects, but the sections about Super Mario Odyssey and Paper Mario seem somewhat tangential, and I fear that if we don't properly nail down specifically what the scope of this page is meant to be, it'll eventually start randomly covering every single instance of a frying pan appearing in a Mario game, regardless if it has any importance to the plot or gameplay. Resulting in irrelevant passages such as:

And other things paragraphs like that. What exactly are we trying to cover in article? Wandering Poplin (talk) 14:42, December 26, 2025 (EST)

Reading the proposal, it says for option #2: merge the frying pans and make this article about both the frying pan associated with Peach and frying pans in general. PrincessPeachFan (talk) 07:51, December 27, 2025 (EST)
I don't really think what you said would add or solve anything in the situation, nor does it really address Wandering Poplin's actual problem with the article (that being, their fear that the article's scope could become too broad and may cover instances of frying pans that are completely irrelevant). You instead just reiterated what they already know, which doesn't really help anyone in the grand scheme of things. ArendLogoTransparent.pngrend (talk) (edits) 09:59, December 27, 2025 (EST)
I think we're okay scope wise. You could probably shovel all "assorted chef characters" into the introduction. Sticking to "does something in a work of fiction aside from being visual" for the History section seems to be working out. Salmancer (talk) 10:11, December 27, 2025 (EST)