Talk:Biting Bullet Bill

Is this an official name? These could just be Missile Bills. -- Son of Suns

There not Missile Bills because Missile Bills don't try and eat Mario. Luigibros2

YI 1

Are these also in the original Yoshi's Island? What level are they in? Fawfulfury65

They aren't in the original Yoshi's Island. I don't believe any form of Bullet Bill is, actually. Redstar 17:32, 9 December 2009 (EST)

Official Name?

This could just be Missile Bills. They act exactly the same... --Binarystep (talk) 02:33, 13 February 2015 (EST)

According to a comment above, they're different because "Missile Bills don't try and eat Mario". I'm not entirely sure how true that statement is (this is the best video that shows off the Bills, but they don't really get a chance to "bite"), but the distinction seems superficial. ~~

From my experience, they're exactly the same. Binarystep (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2015 (EDT)

Is there even a Super Mario Advance 3 player's guide, Nintendo Power or Prima? It looks like there isn't which, if we're not considering these Missile Bills, should at the very least swap out that {{refneeded}} for a conjecture tag. LinkTheLefty (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2015 (EDT)

Merge Biting Bullet Bill with Bull's-Eye Bill

This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

don't merge 4-5

This enemy almost acts exactly as a Bull's-Eye Bill does in New Super Mario Bros. Wii (and evidently Super Mario Maker), being a slower version of a Bullet Bill that curves dynamically to home in on the player. The chomping "wakawaka" motion is an aesthetic (not an attack), and it has a similar red tinge; the only real difference is that when this version fatigues, it pops.

Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: July 31, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. LinkTheLefty (talk) Per.
2. Binarystep (talk) Per LTL.
3. Pyro Guy (talk) Seeing as the name Biting Bullet Bill was created by the wiki, and that they are unused, there isn't really any evidence suggesting that they are different apart from the biting. Merging would get rid of the conjectural tag, and would make a lot more sense.
4. Bazooka Mario (talk) Just on behavior and looks alone, you'd split a lot of Bullet Bills from each other since they differ so much from game to game. I think this removes conjecture and acknowledges the variations among games. The popping thing isn't anything special, since it's just a generic effect.

Oppose

1. TheHelper1000 (talk) Just because they act in a similar way doesn't mean that they're the same.
2. Walkazo (talk) - A big, bitey mouth is pretty unique as far as Bullet Bills go (Bouncing Bullet Bills only open their mouth in defeat, while Bullet Bills in the same game do neither, from what I've seen), and popping like a bubble isn't the same thing as exploding at all. There's no reason to go out of our way to merge this perfectly serviceable article.
3. Time Turner (talk) Two enemies having the same behavior doesn't make them the same enemy. If there isn't any solid proof that the Biting Bullet Bill is an iteration of the Bull's-Eye Bill, I'm not comfortable with this merge.
4. LudwigVon (talk) Per all.
5. Lumastar (talk) Per all. I don't see the two as being the same for reasons stated above.

Comments

My two cents: I've recently bought the guide to SMA3, specifically to clear this up, and the guide barely even covers the last level. All it has is a full map and two paragraphs for the intro. Either that, or a page is missing (though there really doesn't seem to be any tears), and I'll have to contact the seller about that... In any case, the official guide doesn't seem to be much help. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

@Time Tuner: I didn't even realize there was a guide (I would've left it as {{refneeded}} over the conjecture tag earlier if I knew)! It's too bad it doesn't have this enemy from what you can tell, but it'd still be useful here if there are any other spelling differences or naming updates (or potential clarifications) if it's from Nintendo Power, since the newer guide would supersede the names that are from the older SNES guide.

@TheHelper1000: You have to include a reason with your vote. I'll say this, though: it has more in common with the New Super Mario Bros. Bull's-Eye Bills than the original Missile Bill from Super Mario Bros. 3 (which only about-faced once if they missed Mario), but otherwise the behavior is spot-on. In New Super Mario Bros. U, the Bull's-Eye Bill also self-destructs, and like this enemy the blast radius isn't sufficient to take its target with it. LinkTheLefty (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2015 (EDT)

I'm iffy about this move because these appear to be mini Banzai Bills that home on you and are on a set timer rather than Bulls-Eye Bills. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:24, 17 July 2015 (EDT)

Banzai Bills aren't in the game, so these are Bullet Bills in their limbless design. Apparently, some artists thought the arms looked like teeth in their original sprite, so that's why it varied earlier before settling on arms for Bullet Bill and teeth for Banzai Bill. LinkTheLefty (talk) 23:22, 17 July 2015 (EDT)

Don't normal bullet bills "chomp" and pop after a while - in this game? --Hiccup (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2015 (EDT)

@Hiccup: I believe Bouncing Bullet Bills do, but my cartridge battery no longer functions, so it's unfortunately inconvenient for me to double-check.

@Walkazo: The discussion above actually tried to figure out if Biting Bullet Bills try to "eat Mario", which is the precise reason this article was named separately from Missile Bill in the first place. "Biting Bullet Bill" suggests that is the enemy's key difference, but outside of the sprite rotation, it seems to just have Bullet Bill's usual hitbox. In all likelihood, the reason they awkwardly cycle between two frames of animation to give the illusion of biting is because the programming was slightly incomplete and didn't need to be finished when it was initially scrapped, but the porting team didn't bother tampering with it in the GBA version. The difference from the popping bubble/item animation (again, probably hinging on a lazy leftover, considering most players aren't going to see the Extra levels) and the exploding one in New Super Mario Bros. U seems to be aesthetic, since the latter cannot cause damage either from what I've tested out. Lastly, the design difference isn't "tenuous" - after Super Mario Bros. 3, Bull's-Eye Bill has since just been a reddish palette swap of the game's Bullet Bill, toothless or armless. LinkTheLefty (talk) 16:32, 18 July 2015 (EDT)

Good point, especially about that appearance in Super Mario Sunshine. If you look at Gallery:Bullet Bill, you can see a lot of drastic design differences across games. Even in Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island, the Bullet Bill has a no arms and a huge grin. By using the opposers' logic, you'd have to split all those Bullet Bills alone... As for that popping thing, don't all enemies making a popping noise when they're defeated? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:20, 20 July 2015 (EDT)

In the SNES game at least, they don't make a noise when they pop - but outside of the split-second shrinking, the effect is really generic and is also used other times such as collecting a flower or using a key to open a locked door. Even if they were intended to detonate properly, the explosive properties of Bullet Bills in general regularly change outside of traditional 2D platformers. LinkTheLefty (talk) 10:20, 21 July 2015 (EDT)

Merge With Bullseye Bill

There is honestly no reason for these to be separate, they are red versions of the respective games' Bullet Bills that chase. The reason they bite is not so they can "eat" Yoshi, it's just a way to make them look more predatory. And they couldn't follow in the same manner in SMB3 because the NES didn't have sprite rotation. This needs reexamined something terrible. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2017 (CT)

That's speculation on your part, unless you have an official source. Considering the differences that are already apparent, I don't see the harm in leaving them separated. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:16, 20 July 2017 (EDT)

Is there any official source that lists the purple blinky-nosed Bullets of Super Mario Sunshine as Bullseye/Missile Bills? Because they have roughly the same amount of differences, yet are classified as such. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 16:52, 20 July 2017 (CT)

There are at least a couple of Sunshine enemies that are notably different but were lumped into other articles, such as Bob-omb. I'd be in support of giving them separate articles. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 18:00, 20 July 2017 (EDT)

The arguments for and against have all been laid out above for anyone to read if they so choose and decide for themselves. To add, "Biting" is a conjectural misnomer because there are plenty of other enemies in this game that can have Yoshi in its mouth, but this Bullet Bill is not one of them like the name would imply. If nothing else, it should at least be changed to something more descriptive. Also, if we're bringing Bob-ombs into this, might as well throw in the Super Mario Bros. 2 Bob-ombs – they have different appearances and Japanese names, but officially, Bob-ombs are considered by Nintendo to have debuted in that game proper. That would be a total dud, as would adding "(Super Mario Sunshine)" identifiers to various articles like Blooper, Boo, Bullet Bill, Cheep Cheep, Monty Mole, etc. LinkTheLefty (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2017 (EDT)