User talk:TheFlameChomp/Archive 2
TheFlameChomp's Talk Archives
|
Rules:
- No flaming, spamming, or vandalism. Any flaming, spamming, or vandalism will be removed.
- Do not remove comments unless they are flaming, vandalism, or spamming.
- Friend requests are allowed, but only if I know you well enough.
- I will most likely respond to you on this page.
- Have fun!
Edits
Hello! Right now I want to edit, but I don't find any page that needs editing! There's a Category of pages needing edits? Thank you. LED42™ (talk – edits) 11:18, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
- A good place where you can find some pages that need editing is through links found on MarioWiki:Maintenance. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
Thank you again :) LED42™ (talk – edits) 11:26, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
Request
Hey! I know that I'm very new in the wiki, but I think you're cool! So, would you like to be my friend? Add this code if you accept! (Without the spaces). { {userboxp|border=#FF0000|mainbkgd=#FF5555|codebkgd=#FF0000|codecolor=#000000|code=[ [File:StarMK8.png|thumb|50px] ]|msg=This user is friend of [ [User:LED42|LED42] ] ([ [User talk:LED42|talk] ]).} } LED42™ (talk – edits) 19:02, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
- Sure! Here's the code for my box:
{{userbox|border=#EE0000|mainbkgd=#FF8000|codebkgd=#EE7700|codecolor=black|code=[[File:FlameChompNSMBW.png|60px]]|msg=This user is friends with [[User:TheFlameChomp|TheFlameChomp]]!}}
:) --TheFlameChomp (talk) 19:25, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
Great! :D LED42™ (talk – edits) 19:49, 30 August 2017 (EDT)
Personal Sandbox
Hello, man! Can I create a Sandbox for me? Does it disagree with the rules? Thanks. LED42™ (talk – edits) 18:59, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
- Yes, you can have a sandbox (for example, here's mine: User:TheFlameChomp/Sandbox) It must be a subpage of your userpage, similarly to your signature page. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 19:05, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
I asked the same thing to Alex95 because you've logged out. :P Thank you anyway. LED42™ (talk – edits) 19:11, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
Wha-wha-what!? Your user page says that you've joined to the wiki on January, 2017. And it says that you started editing on September, 2016! A mistake or what? :s LED42™ (talk – edits) 19:30, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
- I created an account in January, though I made my first edit anonymously on November 3rd, 2016. I edited anonymously a lot before I created an account. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 19:41, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
Page split
Hi! The page Stronghold Showdown says that it was suggested to split into two pages, can I do that? LED42™ (talk – edits) 21:36, 2 September 2017 (EDT)
- Changes like that are usually brought up on the talk page of the article before they are done. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2017 (EDT)
There are no discussions on that page... :/ LED42™ (talk – edits) 21:47, 2 September 2017 (EDT)
- You could probabaly start one (I think that template is usually used when there is a discussion about the split) --TheFlameChomp (talk) 21:50, 2 September 2017 (EDT)
So, I'll just start it soon, thank you. LED42™ (talk – edits) 21:54, 2 September 2017 (EDT)
About Skuchi037
Now that the user is blocked, shouldn't all of the votes from this user on proposals be removed? The proposal rules say that banned users votes should be removed once they are blocked. – Owencrazyboy9 (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2017 (EDT)
- Was actually editting the proposal page now to remove them. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 17:51, 3 September 2017 (EDT)
Pardon me (and I really don't want to make a habit of these questions), but may I ask why Skuchi was blocked? He hadn't even received a warning after returning from his block. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:52, 3 September 2017 (EDT)
- We (the admins) discussed it. Also, if a user continues the action they were blocked for the first time, another warning is unnecessary. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2017 (EDT)
- Fair enough. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:54, 3 September 2017 (EDT)
Reverts
Hey, how many vandals were today! I'm asking you, because I've seen you and other users reverting edits, so, I want to help more if no patrollers nor admins are online, so how do I revert edits? Thank you :)
Oh, by the way, congratulations! LED42™ (talk – edits) 10:33, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
- You can revert edits by going into the page history and pressing "undo". --TheFlameChomp (talk) 10:35, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
Can you delete the info of the vandal that I reverted on the Blizzard Midbus page. Yoshi the SSM (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
- Ok. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
Vandal
So, I saw someone really doesn't like Midbus. Good job keeping on top of....whatever was going on there. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2017 (EDT)
Straw
If you don't mind me asking, what's the difference between the Lava Bud and the Straw? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:10, 12 September 2017 (EDT)
- Unlike Lava Buds, the Straw doesn't act like a separate enemy and cannot attack. While other objects that heal a boss's HP (for example, Donut) have their own page, they are separate from the boss while the Straw appears to be a part of Durmite. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2017 (EDT)
If you don't mind, since I haven't played Paper Jam myself, could you tell me the difference between the Shiny enemies and the regular Paper enemies? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 13:05, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- The differences I can think of are their rarity, and their different stats, item drops, and appearance. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 13:08, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- Are they dissimilar to the Limbo Bros or the Chuck Guys? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 13:09, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I feel the shiny enemies are treated more like the same enemy, just tougher, similarly to Shiny Pokémon, as they basically replace the normal enemy on the rare occasion they appear in battle, while the Limbo Bros. and Chuck Guys are more like R enemies from Dream Team and Shiny enemies from Sticker Star, which are more like later game enemies that are stronger that are fought completely separate from the originals. Also, I most likely won't get back to you right away at the minute if you ask me more questions, as I am currently in class at school.--TheFlameChomp (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- They sound similar to the Gold Beanies and Amazy Dayzees, then. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 15:54, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- That sounds like a good comparison, apart from the fact that they have different names from the enemy they replace. I'm honestly not opposed to option three of the proposal, I just plan to continue to vote for option one. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- To me, it seems silly to not give them individual articles solely because their name is the same when everything about them is different and subjects that are quite similar to them already have individual articles. Perhaps you could vote for option three alongside option one? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 16:34, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I might, though I'm not exactly sure what would happen to the pages such as Shiny Goomba that cover Sticker Star and Paper Jam if that option were to pass. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I want to say that I'm fine with them staying in the same article - the Shiny Goombas and others like them share their glittery appearance between games as well as their role of being stronger variants of other enemies - but then there's Shiny Bob-omb, which apparently has two variants in Paper Jam, and I disagree with lumping both of them into the same article since they have different stats within the same game... or maybe it'd be better to keep them in the same article since they still share their appearance? I'm still totally for splitting the shiny enemies from the not-shiny enemies, for all the reasons I outlined before, but I'm not certain what to do when there are multiple shiny variants of the same enemy. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:03, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I feel that the enemies that have different stats but the same appearance in the game should stay together, as splitting every one could make navigation very difficult (Fly Guys have four different variants in the game, and so do Paper Boos if you count the ones that assist King Boo in battle). --TheFlameChomp (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I can agree with that, so long as they do have the same appearance. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:43, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I feel that the enemies that have different stats but the same appearance in the game should stay together, as splitting every one could make navigation very difficult (Fly Guys have four different variants in the game, and so do Paper Boos if you count the ones that assist King Boo in battle). --TheFlameChomp (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I want to say that I'm fine with them staying in the same article - the Shiny Goombas and others like them share their glittery appearance between games as well as their role of being stronger variants of other enemies - but then there's Shiny Bob-omb, which apparently has two variants in Paper Jam, and I disagree with lumping both of them into the same article since they have different stats within the same game... or maybe it'd be better to keep them in the same article since they still share their appearance? I'm still totally for splitting the shiny enemies from the not-shiny enemies, for all the reasons I outlined before, but I'm not certain what to do when there are multiple shiny variants of the same enemy. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:03, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I might, though I'm not exactly sure what would happen to the pages such as Shiny Goomba that cover Sticker Star and Paper Jam if that option were to pass. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- To me, it seems silly to not give them individual articles solely because their name is the same when everything about them is different and subjects that are quite similar to them already have individual articles. Perhaps you could vote for option three alongside option one? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 16:34, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- That sounds like a good comparison, apart from the fact that they have different names from the enemy they replace. I'm honestly not opposed to option three of the proposal, I just plan to continue to vote for option one. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- They sound similar to the Gold Beanies and Amazy Dayzees, then. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 15:54, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- I feel the shiny enemies are treated more like the same enemy, just tougher, similarly to Shiny Pokémon, as they basically replace the normal enemy on the rare occasion they appear in battle, while the Limbo Bros. and Chuck Guys are more like R enemies from Dream Team and Shiny enemies from Sticker Star, which are more like later game enemies that are stronger that are fought completely separate from the originals. Also, I most likely won't get back to you right away at the minute if you ask me more questions, as I am currently in class at school.--TheFlameChomp (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
- Are they dissimilar to the Limbo Bros or the Chuck Guys? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 13:09, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
Template?
Hello! Is there a template for "Who's online"? I didn't find it in the Notice template category, nor the Navigation template category... LED42™ (talk – edits) 12:19, 14 September 2017 (EDT)
- There isn't a specific template, but you can transclude the special page by adding
{{special:whosonline}}
to your user page.--TheFlameChomp (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2017 (EDT)
Blooper Glitch
Hello! I think that I've found a glitch in New Super Mario Bros., in World 3-3. You can try it, because I can't upload an image right now. Enter the area with the Star Coin and the lot of Bloopers and Blooper Nannies, try to get a Super Star, and then swim to a nearby Blooper Nanny. You'll probably see it flashing in rainbow colors like if it were under the effects of a Super Star. I'm pretty sure that it's a glitch, but I'm asking you because I am not completely sure. Thank you. LED42™ (talk – edits) 21:29, 17 September 2017 (EDT)
- I think that the Blooper Nannies are supposed to flash like that, as they seem to do it even if you don't have a star. The flashing is mentioned on the Blooper Nanny page, and it also states that they glowed before launching the Blooper Babies in Super Mario Bros. 3, so I think it's an intentional feature that was just not brought back in any other game. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 21:57, 17 September 2017 (EDT)
Proposal
Yoshi the SSM (talk) has since left a comment aimed towards you after MrConcreteDonkey's vote here. (T|C) 21:05, 18 September 2017 (EDT)