Talk:Light Block: Difference between revisions
(→Support: Added vote) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Split Glow Block from this article == | == Split Glow Block from this article == | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | |||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|passed|6-0|split}} | ||
Okay, I think that we've all been living under a misconception for far too long here: Light Blocks and Glow Blocks aren't quite the same thing. Like the [[Talk:Pink Coin (Super Mario Maker)#Split into Pink Coin (Super Mario Maker) and Pink Coin (Super Mario Run)|Pink Coin proposal]] I initiated over three-and-a-half years ago, these are two different objects with straightforward differences: Glow Blocks are portable, whereas Light Blocks are not. Plus, some Light Blocks can be activated by using [[? Switch]]es, a trait not shared by Glow Blocks. Given these two major differences, I'd say there's enough merit for a split. | Okay, I think that we've all been living under a misconception for far too long here: Light Blocks and Glow Blocks aren't quite the same thing. Like the [[Talk:Pink Coin (Super Mario Maker)#Split into Pink Coin (Super Mario Maker) and Pink Coin (Super Mario Run)|Pink Coin proposal]] I initiated over three-and-a-half years ago, these are two different objects with straightforward differences: Glow Blocks are portable, whereas Light Blocks are not. Plus, some Light Blocks can be activated by using [[? Switch]]es, a trait not shared by Glow Blocks. Given these two major differences, I'd say there's enough merit for a split. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Actually, "Glow Block" and "Light Block" are used in the trading card and the Prima guide for the same object in NSMBW (光るブロック), but the big ones are different, "Light Foothold" (光る足場). There's thus no English name basis for a split, since "Light Block" has been used interchangeably of both objects. [[User:SmokedChili|SmokedChili]] ([[User talk:SmokedChili|talk]]) 09:39, July 15, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:Well, I was afraid of that... In that case, wouldn't the article's title be something like {{fake link|Light Block (portable)}}? {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 10:00, July 15, 2020 (EDT) | |||
::I'd say this probably falls in line with [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Make an exception to source priority for articles with identical names|source priority exception]], i.e. use the unique name despite it being lower priority. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 18:33, July 15, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:02, July 27, 2020
Split Glow Block from this article[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
split 6-0
Okay, I think that we've all been living under a misconception for far too long here: Light Blocks and Glow Blocks aren't quite the same thing. Like the Pink Coin proposal I initiated over three-and-a-half years ago, these are two different objects with straightforward differences: Glow Blocks are portable, whereas Light Blocks are not. Plus, some Light Blocks can be activated by using ? Switches, a trait not shared by Glow Blocks. Given these two major differences, I'd say there's enough merit for a split.
Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: July 27, 2020, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per my proposal.
- Keyblade Master (talk) Yeah, it doesn't fully make sense for them to be on the same page.
- Scrooge200 (talk) Per proposal.
- DarkNight (talk) Per proposal.
- Duckfan77 (talk) Per proposal.
- Salmancer (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose[edit]
Comments[edit]
Actually, "Glow Block" and "Light Block" are used in the trading card and the Prima guide for the same object in NSMBW (光るブロック), but the big ones are different, "Light Foothold" (光る足場). There's thus no English name basis for a split, since "Light Block" has been used interchangeably of both objects. SmokedChili (talk) 09:39, July 15, 2020 (EDT)
- Well, I was afraid of that... In that case, wouldn't the article's title be something like Light Block (portable)?
(T|C) 10:00, July 15, 2020 (EDT)
- I'd say this probably falls in line with source priority exception, i.e. use the unique name despite it being lower priority. LinkTheLefty (talk) 18:33, July 15, 2020 (EDT)
