Talk:Europe: Difference between revisions
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Delete this page== {{TPP}} Second verse, same as the first. Every subject in this article, from the Louvre to Venice, Paris, Germany, Austri...") |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Delete this page== | ==Delete this page== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|6-0|delete}} | |||
Second verse, [[Talk:Asia|same as the first]]. Every subject in this article, from the [[Louvre]] to [[Venice]], [[Paris]], [[Germany]], [[Austria]], [[United Kingdom]], [[London]], and the other ''[[Mario is Missing!]]'' cities, has an article (besides [[Istanbul]], but I'm working on fixing that, and it's a moot point when nothing about the city is covered here). The other continents, like [[North America]] and [[South America]], have those broad articles exactly because we have information that wouldn't fit anywhere more specific. In "[[7 Continents for 7 Koopas]]", we don't know where specifically they visit in North America, South America, or the other continents, which is why we must have articles on them. Europe has no such caveat. For the same reason we don't have an article on every single country that appears in ''Mario is Missing!'', but rather its specific cities, we shouldn't have an article on Europe. | Second verse, [[Talk:Asia|same as the first]]. Every subject in this article, from the [[Louvre]] to [[Venice]], [[Paris]], [[Germany]], [[Austria]], [[United Kingdom]], [[London]], and the other ''[[Mario is Missing!]]'' cities, has an article (besides [[Istanbul]], but I'm working on fixing that, and it's a moot point when nothing about the city is covered here). The other continents, like [[North America]] and [[South America]], have those broad articles exactly because we have information that wouldn't fit anywhere more specific. In "[[7 Continents for 7 Koopas]]", we don't know where specifically they visit in North America, South America, or the other continents, which is why we must have articles on them. Europe has no such caveat. For the same reason we don't have an article on every single country that appears in ''Mario is Missing!'', but rather its specific cities, we shouldn't have an article on Europe. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Time Turner}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} - Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Ultimate Mr. L}} Per this and the Asia proposal. | |||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Per all. | |||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
@Lcross: this is the Mario Wiki. We cover content that's important to ''Mario''. What is harmful about not having this page here, especially since, as I made clear, every single piece of information in this article already exists, in more detail, on other articles? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 22:47, 25 January 2018 (EST) | |||
:And the relevance of them being the biggest landmasses is...? I'm all for the deletion of all the continents if the relevant information is already covered in separate articles. Most of the information regarding the continents do have their own page, these just seem like unnecessary disambiguations of real-world subjects. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 22:49, 25 January 2018 (EST) | |||
::You're dang right about that, Turner. That's exactly what we're doing with these articles---covering the Mario-related aspects of the objects. What am I missing? I don't think I'm wrong here. {{User:Lcrossmk8/sig}} 23:17, 25 January 2018 (EST) | |||
:::Have you noticed how I mentioned the huge amount of redundancy, and how that makes the article pointless and not worth keeping? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 23:20, 25 January 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:00, February 10, 2018
Delete this page
Template:SettledTPP Template:ProposalOutcome
Second verse, same as the first. Every subject in this article, from the Louvre to Venice, Paris, Germany, Austria, United Kingdom, London, and the other Mario is Missing! cities, has an article (besides Istanbul, but I'm working on fixing that, and it's a moot point when nothing about the city is covered here). The other continents, like North America and South America, have those broad articles exactly because we have information that wouldn't fit anywhere more specific. In "7 Continents for 7 Koopas", we don't know where specifically they visit in North America, South America, or the other continents, which is why we must have articles on them. Europe has no such caveat. For the same reason we don't have an article on every single country that appears in Mario is Missing!, but rather its specific cities, we shouldn't have an article on Europe.
Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: February 9, 2018, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Time Turner (talk) Per proposal.
- Alex95 (talk) - Per proposal.
- Ultimate Mr. L (talk) Per this and the Asia proposal.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per proposal.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per all.
- LuigiMaster123 (talk) Per all.
Oppose
Comments
@Lcross: this is the Mario Wiki. We cover content that's important to Mario. What is harmful about not having this page here, especially since, as I made clear, every single piece of information in this article already exists, in more detail, on other articles? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 22:47, 25 January 2018 (EST)
- And the relevance of them being the biggest landmasses is...? I'm all for the deletion of all the continents if the relevant information is already covered in separate articles. Most of the information regarding the continents do have their own page, these just seem like unnecessary disambiguations of real-world subjects.
22:49, 25 January 2018 (EST)
- You're dang right about that, Turner. That's exactly what we're doing with these articles---covering the Mario-related aspects of the objects. What am I missing? I don't think I'm wrong here. Lcrossmk8 (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2018 (EST)
- Have you noticed how I mentioned the huge amount of redundancy, and how that makes the article pointless and not worth keeping? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 23:20, 25 January 2018 (EST)
- You're dang right about that, Turner. That's exactly what we're doing with these articles---covering the Mario-related aspects of the objects. What am I missing? I don't think I'm wrong here. Lcrossmk8 (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2018 (EST)
