Talk:Iron Cleft: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
::Also, I am generally in favor of merging KP Koopa and KP Paratroopa with KP Koopas. I think that their status as a "species" is dubious, especially since at least the [[KP Paratroopa]] is said to have dyed its shell in its Tattle Log entry, and the same is implicitly the case for the other KP Koopas. This really makes them seem like a group of characters rather than a species, regardless of how the game treats them on a technical level (their species is presumably Koopa Troopa, since they look like Koopa Troopas, have the same stats as Koopa Troopas, and so forth). I left them out of this proposal to limit the scope, and because I think the Iron Clefts have an even better argument for being merged. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 16:23, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
::Also, I am generally in favor of merging KP Koopa and KP Paratroopa with KP Koopas. I think that their status as a "species" is dubious, especially since at least the [[KP Paratroopa]] is said to have dyed its shell in its Tattle Log entry, and the same is implicitly the case for the other KP Koopas. This really makes them seem like a group of characters rather than a species, regardless of how the game treats them on a technical level (their species is presumably Koopa Troopa, since they look like Koopa Troopas, have the same stats as Koopa Troopas, and so forth). I left them out of this proposal to limit the scope, and because I think the Iron Clefts have an even better argument for being merged. {{User:Pseudo/sig}} 16:23, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
:::I mean, I agree that all the info currently covered on [[KP Koopa]] and [[KP Paratroopa]] could easily be covered between [[KP Koopas]], [[Koopa Troopa]] and [[Koopa Paratroopa]], it's just not as straightforward as a simple merge. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 17:14, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
:::I mean, I agree that all the info currently covered on [[KP Koopa]] and [[KP Paratroopa]] could easily be covered between [[KP Koopas]], [[Koopa Troopa]] and [[Koopa Paratroopa]], it's just not as straightforward as a simple merge. [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 17:14, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
::::How so? Not trying to sound condescending, I'm just struggling to think of any reasons given to keep them separate beyond the species/characters division that I've personally found dubious. [[User:DrippingYellow|DrippingYellow]] ([[User talk:DrippingYellow|talk]]) 20:39, May 26, 2024 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:39, May 26, 2024

Merge with The Iron Adonis Twins

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Monday, June 17, 2024, 14:32 GMT

Per SMW:Once and only once, this article is quite redundant with the text of The Iron Adonis Twins, which contains essentially the same information at the moment, even including the two Iron Clefts' stats. While the Armored Harriers aren't unique in being enemies exclusive to the Glitz Pit (the Tiny Spinies, KP Koopas, and Punk Rocks are other examples), they are uniquely story-relevant unlike those teams, are treated as mini-bosses and unique characters by the game (including separate Tattle Log entries for the two members owing to their slightly different designs), and frankly this article has little unique to offer as a result. I do think that there is an argument for merging the other aforementioned teams containing unique enemies as well, but there are more pitfalls there, such as the Magikoopa Masters containing unique enemies who previously appeared in Paper Mario on the N64, for example, or several of the later teams containing enemies that otherwise only appear in the Pit of 100 Trials, so I will restrict this proposal to the Iron Clefts, at least for the time being.

EDIT: I created a draft for the merged page. I think it demonstrates that nothing of value is lost by these pages being merged: User:Pseudo/The Iron Adonis Twins draft

Proposer: Pseudo (talk)
Deadline: June 6, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Merge Iron Cleft with The Iron Adonis Twins

  1. Pseudo (talk) Per proposal.
  2. EvieMaybe (talk) permored proposier
  3. DrippingYellow (talk) Per how we treat enemies such as the Red & Blue Goomba Bros. Though a species, it's a species that consists of only two individuals that are technically considered separate characters in the tattle log (specifically, the green-shoed one is additionally speculated to be the younger brother). We haven't split any other enemy articles into one covering story role and one covering battle mechanics, so I don't see what the difference is here. I would even go as far as to merge the KP Koopas with... the KP Koopas for similar reasons.
    And before anyone brings up "searchability", redirects do show up in the search bar. We can merge these articles into a more convenient form, and still link to the species when necessary as a redirect, so nothing should change for the worse in practice.

Merge The Iron Adonis Twins with Iron Cleft

  1. Camwoodstock (talk) Per proposal + comments below that this'd make more sense overall--either way, one of these ought to merge into the other.
  2. Tails777 (talk) Primary option. Despite not fully being on board with merging them, I can see the valid points made. Everything can truthfully be told on one article, which would make sense. And if anything, I feel it's better to stick with the name of the enemy rather than the name of the team.
  3. MegaBowser64 (talk) Per everyone (collectively)

Don't merge

  1. Tails777 (talk) Secondary option. Truth be told, I'm not entirely on board with merging them, despite the valid points made. The Armored Harriers article does well to explain what the two Iron Clefts do from a story standpoint while the Iron Cleft article does what it needs to do to talk about the Iron Cleft.
  2. Waluigi Time (talk) Either option would create a weird inconsistency in our TTYD coverage. Either Iron Cleft is the only enemy without its own page, or the Armored Harriers are the only Glitz Pit team without a page. The current situation is fine, Iron Cleft describes the enemy type and Armored Harriers is more about the characters and their role in the story. If anything, the enemy stats could be removed from the Glitz Pit teams across the board to cut down on redundancy.
  3. SolemnStormcloud (talk) Per Waluigi Time.
  4. Sparks (talk) Per all.
  5. Hewer (talk) Per Waluigi Time, I don't think the similarity of the two articles alone is a good enough reason to merge them.
  6. Nightwicked Bowser (talk) Per all. Also I've moved the Armored Harriers article to "The Iron Adonis Twins" due to what I said in my comment, so this proposal may need some name changing.
  7. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per Waluigi Time. I agree with the suggestion to remove enemy stats from the team pages to reduce redundancy, but I think it would be inconsistent to have this be the only case of the Glitz Pit team and enemies being merged, especially since it is not the only case of the enemy being exclusive to the Glitz Pit.
  8. Blinker (talk) Per all.
  9. Arend (talk) Per all.

Comments

I feel that it should be the other way around, merging Armored Harriers to Iron Cleft, as the Armored Harriers are a team name while Iron Clefts are the actual enemies. Sprite of Yoshi's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Tails777 Talk to me!Robin's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate

I see the Armored Harriers as the name of the characters, and it's the primary name they're referred to as in-game, with "Iron Cleft" only appearing in battle if I'm not mistaken. If Rawk Hawk's species was said to be, say, "Birdman", I think it's fairly unlikely that we'd have a Birdman article separate from Rawk Hawk's, let alone having "Birdman" as the primary article title. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 17:16, May 23, 2024 (EDT)
EDIT: That said, I'll add this as an option for the proposal. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 17:18, May 23, 2024 (EDT)
They are still listed as Iron Clefts in the Tattle Log as well, hence why I prefer the idea of keeping Iron Cleft as the main article name, as that's the enemy name, rather than the title given to both of them as a group. Sprite of Yoshi's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Tails777 Talk to me!Robin's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate

Haven't decided on a vote on this proposal but there is something important I should bring up. In the remake, "Iron Adonis Twins" is their main name and I haven't caught a glimpse of the "Armored Harriers" name. Bowser Nightwicked Bowser Bowser emblem from Mario Kart 8 19:41, May 23, 2024 (EDT)

May as well update, "Armored Harriers" is the name they're introduced as in the remake, which in the original "Iron Adonis Twins" was. Bowser Nightwicked Bowser Bowser emblem from Mario Kart 8 11:32, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
Updated. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 18:38, May 24, 2024 (EDT)

I think it should be noted in this proposal, that considering the massive instant success this game has achieved, it's not unlikely that Intelligent Systems will roll back many of the decisions that resulted in Sticker Star-through-The Origami King (after all, it's money that matters, not stymieing creative control)... and as such, there's a real possibility that Iron Clefts could reappear in the future independently. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:27, May 23, 2024 (EDT)

I definitely hear this, but I'd rather cross that bridge when we come to it, personally. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 18:38, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
Personally, I'd be more comfortable merging Craw-Daddy with Dark Craw and Koopinator to Dark Koopatrol, since they're treated interchangeably in the language-of-origin (plus several others) here. But still, to keep the Glitz ranking thing, we probably shouldn't unless we change the format a bit. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 19:01, May 24, 2024 (EDT)

@Waluigi Time: I definitely hear you regarding removing enemy stats from the Glitz Pit team pages. I will probably make a proposal for that after this one ends. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 18:38, May 24, 2024 (EDT)

@DrippingYellow I'm not sure what you mean by comparing this to the Goomba Bros. "Red Goomba" and "Blue Goomba" aren't species. They're the characters' actual (if not very creative) names. As for the KP Koopas, that doesn't make much sense, considering only two of three members of the team are normal KP Koopas in the first place, the third being a KP Paratroopa instead. Blinker (talk) 14:03, May 25, 2024 (EDT)

It's not that Red and Blue Goombas are species, it's that the Iron Cleft "species" consists of only two members, neither of which are treated as the exact same entity. They both have the same generic name, but so do other character pairs such as the "L33T HAMM3R BROZ." We also don't, for instance, split the Smorgs that comprise the large conglomerate of the same name simply because they are referred to as a species, whereas the Smorg is a boss. The KP Koopas are an extremely similar situation, only they don't even have unique attributes other than being part of the KP Koopas; they are explicitly referred to in-game as regular Koopas that have dyed their shell. They are even identical to Koopa Troopas stat-wise (seemingly aside from interactions with certain items). The KP Koopas and KP Paratroopa are the KP Koopas. The Iron Clefts are the Iron Adonis Twins. It doesn't get much closer to pointlessly repeating/splitting information than this. DrippingYellow (talk) 17:35, May 25, 2024 (EDT)
Highly agreed on all counts, you said it better than I could. The two Iron Adonis Twins having distinct designs from one another (recognized as separate enemies by the game), making them distinct characters in their own right, makes the distinction between species and character seem meaningless. The green Iron Cleft is even referred to as the younger brother in the Tattle Log, making it clear that the Tattle Log entries each refer to distinct characters, not a species. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 16:17, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
Also, I am generally in favor of merging KP Koopa and KP Paratroopa with KP Koopas. I think that their status as a "species" is dubious, especially since at least the KP Paratroopa is said to have dyed its shell in its Tattle Log entry, and the same is implicitly the case for the other KP Koopas. This really makes them seem like a group of characters rather than a species, regardless of how the game treats them on a technical level (their species is presumably Koopa Troopa, since they look like Koopa Troopas, have the same stats as Koopa Troopas, and so forth). I left them out of this proposal to limit the scope, and because I think the Iron Clefts have an even better argument for being merged. Pseudo (talk) (contributions) User:Pseudo 16:23, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
I mean, I agree that all the info currently covered on KP Koopa and KP Paratroopa could easily be covered between KP Koopas, Koopa Troopa and Koopa Paratroopa, it's just not as straightforward as a simple merge. Blinker (talk) 17:14, May 26, 2024 (EDT)
How so? Not trying to sound condescending, I'm just struggling to think of any reasons given to keep them separate beyond the species/characters division that I've personally found dubious. DrippingYellow (talk) 20:39, May 26, 2024 (EDT)