Talk:Tentacle

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

Merge Tentacle into Blooper[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

MERGE 5-0

Tentacles are explicitly mentioned in this very article to be no more than the limbs of Bloopers, and the L. Tentacle and R. Tentacle links already redirect to the main Blooper article instead of this one. I really don't think a Blooper's arms deserve a seperate article just because the player may be able to target them in one game. Any usable information from this article should be merged into Blooper if not already mentioned there.

Proposer: vellidragon (talk)
Deadline: 15 January, 2010, 20:00

Support[edit]

  1. Edofenrir (talk) - If I recall correctly the Blooper's tentacles in Paper Mario 2 don't even have a Tattle Log entry...
  2. Reversinator (talk) Why not Arm, Leg or Foot? Because it doesn't deserve an article.
  3. Redstar (talk) - I'd considered proposing this myself, but went on for some reason. Glad to see it got support anyways.
  4. Gamefreak75 (talk) Per all.
  5. Supermariofan14 (talk) Per Reversinator.

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

What's IICR? Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Should be IIRC, "If I remember correctly". Time Questions 12:06, 1 January 2010 (EST)
Oh. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
And here I was wondering whether I should write it down whole or not. Should have listened to my intuition. I edited it to prevent further confusion. - GabuGabu.png Gabumon(talk) 13:39, 1 January 2010 (EST)

All right, proposal passed. Now what do we salvage from this article to merge into the other? Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Alright, I merged usable stuff from this into Blooper. Not much remained, mainly the fact that Bloopers use tentacles to move and the picture from the article; the rest of the information was either already mentioned, superfluous or incorrect. I don't know what is to be done with the talk page though; can someone please tell me? (And shouldn't this proposal be marked as being over?)--vellidragon 10:52, 16 January 2010 (EST)