Talk:Red and Green (Super Paper Mario): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">([^<\n]+)<\/span>" to "{{ProposalOutcome|green|$1}}")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:
==Move Red and Green (Super Paper Mario) to Red and Green==
==Move Red and Green (Super Paper Mario) to Red and Green==
{{SettledTPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">MOVE 11-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|green|MOVE 11-0}}


Why does this article need the subtile "Super Paper Mario"? On the [[Red & Green|disambiguation page]] for Red and Green, the only other articles there are the [[Armored Harriers]], who are never called red and green, and [[Mario]] and [[Luigi]], and for them, red and green is only a nickname. Red and Green from Super Paper Mario, on the other hand, are called Red and Green, respectively, thus they take priority.
Why does this article need the subtile "Super Paper Mario"? On the [[Red & Green|disambiguation page]] for Red and Green, the only other articles there are the [[Armored Harriers]], who are never called red and green, and [[Mario]] and [[Luigi]], and for them, red and green is only a nickname. Red and Green from Super Paper Mario, on the other hand, are called Red and Green, respectively, thus they take priority.
Line 58: Line 58:
Would the page currently called Red and Green change it's name to, I don't know, Red and Green (disambugation)?  I really don't want to delete it, and if your idea means "delete", I'm opposing.--[[User:Toad85|Toad85]] 06:19, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
Would the page currently called Red and Green change it's name to, I don't know, Red and Green (disambugation)?  I really don't want to delete it, and if your idea means "delete", I'm opposing.--[[User:Toad85|Toad85]] 06:19, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
:Move means "change the name". It's wiki lingo. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 09:34, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
:Move means "change the name". It's wiki lingo. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 09:34, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
:I meant the page currently called [[Red and Green]].  Would ''that'' be deleted or renamed? --[[User:Toad85|Toad85]] 08:17, 4 August 2011 (EDT)
:I meant the page currently called Red and Green.  Would ''that'' be deleted or renamed? --[[User:Toad85|Toad85]] 08:17, 4 August 2011 (EDT)
::Renamed. I am not deleting anything. And Tails, I never said anything about splitting them, so your logic is flawed. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 10:45, 4 August 2011 (EDT)
::Renamed. I am not deleting anything. And Tails, I never said anything about splitting them, so your logic is flawed. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 10:45, 4 August 2011 (EDT)



Latest revision as of 11:09, June 1, 2022

Moved from "Talk:Red the Bridgemaster":

Merge articles[edit]

Should his article be merged with Green the Bridgemaster's one, just like Gramma Red and Gramma Green were? They are both on the same Catch Card anyways...

Artwork of Boshi from Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven StarsMat_Rix_007

What if you say green? Max2 (talk)

We really do need to merge these articles together!

Breakdancemario.gifM64FanBreakdancemario.gif

They probably should be if they have the same Catch Card.--Knife (talk) 14:16, 28 September 2009 (EDT)

Since three users agreed to the merge (four with me), I have merged the two articles. I hope it is ok this way. - Gabumon from the Digimon franchise Gabumon(talk) 20:32, 5 October 2009 (EDT)

"Talk:Red the Bridgemaster" ends here.

Title[edit]

Is there any reason the article is called "Red & Green" rather than "Red and Green"? Compare Cork and Cask, Ashley and Red etc. Time Questions 06:32, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

I looked for a proper name for this article and I took the one listed in the List of Catch Cards. Since the main reason for the merge was the Catch Card the two characters share (No. 207), I thought that would be appropriate. I have no problem however, if the article is changed to Red and Green. - Gabumon from the Digimon franchise Gabumon(talk) 06:48, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
Okay. I think for the sake of consistency, we should change it to "Red and Green". Any objections? Time Questions 07:13, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
Not from my side. If I recall correctly, Ashley and Red are also refered to as Ashley&Red in their game, so it might in fact be better to change the name for consistency. - Gabumon from the Digimon franchise Gabumon(talk) 07:15, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
I just checked, and Ashley and Red are indeed refered to as Ashley & Red in the game (at least once). Under this circumstances there is no question that this article has to be moved to Red and Green as well. - Gabumon from the Digimon franchise Gabumon(talk) 07:27, 6 October 2009 (EDT)

What happens...[edit]

if Peach talks to either one of them? I don't have the game, so I can't check.

R.O.B.Remembered Old BuddyROBSSB4EN.png

Move Red and Green (Super Paper Mario) to Red and Green[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

MOVE 11-0

Why does this article need the subtile "Super Paper Mario"? On the disambiguation page for Red and Green, the only other articles there are the Armored Harriers, who are never called red and green, and Mario and Luigi, and for them, red and green is only a nickname. Red and Green from Super Paper Mario, on the other hand, are called Red and Green, respectively, thus they take priority.

Proposer: Reversinator (talk)
Deadline: August 16, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support[edit]

  1. Reversinator (talk) Per proposal.
  2. Reddragon19k (talk) Yes! Per Reverse and the proposal!!
  3. Zero777 (talk) Per proposal.
  4. Toad85 (talk) Per proposer, because the current "Red and Green" page will not be deleted
  5. Tails777 (talk) Sorry about the whole confusion thing. I get the proposal now and I'm now supporting.
  6. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) If it's their actual names, then it is. And Reversinator is right; no one else in the disambiguation had the name Red and Green. So per proposal.
  7. Supremo78 (talk) Per BLOF. These are their real names, and it should be moved to that.
  8. Mario Bros.! (talk) Per all.
  9. Bowser's luma (talk) Per all.
  10. Walkazo (talk) - Per Reversinator.
  11. Mpeng (talk) Per proposal

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]

Would the page currently called Red and Green change it's name to, I don't know, Red and Green (disambugation)? I really don't want to delete it, and if your idea means "delete", I'm opposing.--Toad85 06:19, 3 August 2011 (EDT)

Move means "change the name". It's wiki lingo. --Reversinator 09:34, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
I meant the page currently called Red and Green. Would that be deleted or renamed? --Toad85 08:17, 4 August 2011 (EDT)
Renamed. I am not deleting anything. And Tails, I never said anything about splitting them, so your logic is flawed. --Reversinator 10:45, 4 August 2011 (EDT)

Oh, so what do you mean then? Tails777 (talk)

Sorry about moving it early. Just woke up and my mind is very tired. --Reversinator 09:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)