Talk:Giant Donkey Kong
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 
22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Thursday, May 2, 2024, 16:03 GMT
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles.
Proposer: BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Deadline: 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT)
Merge
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Consistency is one of my priorities when making decisions.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per proposal.
- Pokémon Trainer Mario (talk) Per BLOF!
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - Per proposal.
- M&SG (talk) - I agree.
- Kaptain K. Rool (talk) - Unlike Giga Bowser, Giant Donkey Kong is just basically Donkey Kong in his giant form.
- Reddragon19k (talk) - Per all because merging is awesome!
- SWFlash (talk) Per Kaptain K. Rool.
Keep Split
Comments
One question. What should we do, in terms of Bowser and Giant Bowser. If Donkey Kong and Giant Donkey Kong are merged, shouldn't Bowser and Giant Bowser be too? Obviously this would require a new proposal. 
M&SG (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
- Reddragon19k: It isn't about because merging is awesome. It is about fixing the article by merging it into another article that will lessen the article count, but that isn't important. The real thing is that you must only merge pages when necessary. Kaptain K. Rool (talk)
