Talk:Bell Kritter: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (moved Talk:Bell Kritters to Talk:Bell Kritter: Singular)
(New TPP.)
Line 5: Line 5:


They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--{{User|Knife}} 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--{{User|Knife}} 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
==Merge this article with [[Kritter#Donkey Kong 64]]==
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at [[MarioWiki:Minor NPCs]], which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.
'''Proposer:''' {{User|YoshiKong}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT
====Support====
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy.
====Oppose====
====Comments?====

Revision as of 07:03, October 3, 2012

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Nope, they shouldn't have an article. Fawfulfury65

They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64

As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.

Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.

Oppose

Comments?