Talk:Bell Kritter

From the Super Mario Wiki

Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Nope, they shouldn't have an article. Fawfulfury65

They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

merge 5-0
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.

Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support[edit]

  1. YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.
  2. Coooool123 (talk) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Why does this even have an article in the first place when it can be easily merged into Kritter?
  4. Kelton2 (talk) Of course. What is with all these small articles that should be merged?
  5. Yoshi K (talk) Hey guys! If we should keep this article, we should make one for the bell they ring too! So in other words, merge.

Oppose[edit]

Comments?[edit]

@Kelton2: Tell me about it. Plus, everyone seems to want to split all the articles of different sizes (eg Mega/Mini versions of the same thing). It's so pointless.Coooool123 (talk)

Size really shouldn't matter when it comes to deciding an article's merit. I mean, I've created many different item articles currently-all are small-yet they are still standalone items and stuff. It's only for stuff like this where this article can be merged into another and still make sense BabyLuigiFire.png(T|C)