MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/King K. Rool

King K. Rool

Remove Featured Article Status

1. DKPetey99 (talk) I know I didn't make this nomination, but the tense is not correct, it's written in the past tense. Also, most sections are missing images. King K. Rool also appeared in one Super Mario-Kun comic. Thus the history is incomplete, meaning it can't stay featured.
2. Mario Bros.! (talk) Rewrite-expand template.
3. Supremo78 (talk) - In the Featured Article requirements, it says no improvement templates. The rewrite template is there. If that is fixed, I will change my vote.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. MrConcreteDonkey (talk): Request for unfeaturing by original requester lacked any kind of reason. Now, the minor problems are fixed, so I don't see the problem. This article contains as much information as I believe it possibly can, and I'm sure others can agree with me.
2. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per MCD.
3. KoopaStrikerCharged (talk) I think that it should keep the status because sure it's written in the past tense, but anyone can fix it. In fact, I might even start fixing it myself.
4. Reddragon19k (talk) Per MCD!
5. Dr Javelin (talk) Fixed a couple of tenses. Looks good to me.
6. New Super Mario (talk) Per MCD
7. Stelios7 (talk) Per MCD! :D
8. GEX (talk)Per MCD
9. Pdjr9000 (talk) A featured article cannot be downgraded back to a plain old article. Once a featured article, always a featured article.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

MrConcreteDonkey

1. DKPetey99 (talk) Now there is reasons.

KoopaStrikerCharged

1. DKPetey99 (talk) All of the rest of the page is written in past tense.

Dr Javelin

1. DKPetey99 (talk) All tense isn't fixed. And no, it is not good yet.

DKPetey99

1. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - The tenses and other problems are fixed. Also, could you explain how it is in such a "horrible" shape. And please explain what issue of Super Mario-Kun he appeared in, and confirm it, because "I think" isn't enough.

Pdjr9000

1. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) Users vote lacks any reason as to why this article is good only the untrue view that once an article is featured it should always be featured.
2. Mario jc (talk) ...says where?

Comments

WTF? Well, the tense isn't consistent. I hope Superrewinder isn't a mindless user nominating this for no reason. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

That user didn't vote too, so I have a feeling Superrewinder did nominate for no reason. Mario jc (talk)

Well I have a reason and we can't just ignore the fact that the article is in horrible shape. DKPetey99 (talk)

No, it's not in horrible shape. It's in great shape. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)

I noticed that this article will be featured on August 20, 2011, and yet it's being requested to be unfeatured. Something doesn't seem right. M&SG (talk)

@Pdjr9000, Uh.. I don't know where you've been, but any article can become unfeatured.. Supremo78 (talk)

Any article can be unfeatured if it doesn't maintain the requirements needed to stay featured. M&SG (talk)