MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party: The Top 100: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party: The Top 100": Archive ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{fa-archive
|nominated=19:31, 28 November 2017 (EST)
|nominated=19:31, 28 November 2017
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|passed=20:42, 28 November 2017
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
Line 12: Line 12:
#{{User|Courtney}} Keep up the great work. I love the article!
#{{User|Courtney}} Keep up the great work. I love the article!
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} I have to say, I'm impressed with the article. Per all.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} I have to say, I'm impressed with the article. Per all.
#{{User|Lcrossmk8}} This looks like a good article, so yeah, I'll put my vote in for this one. Per all.
#{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Kudos to Baby Luigi for doing all this work! Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|Marioguy}} This article is becoming more incredible everytime I see it! Per all.
#{{User|Flappy Bird}} Sure, why not?
#{{User|Whitey}} This article is very well-written and informative, especially for a game that was only released recently. Per all.
#{{User|A51 Trooper}} Per Whitey's reasoning.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Time Turner}} The section for the "other characters" is far too sparse. It lacks detail and it doesn't even have any images. The [[MarioWiki:Empty sections|Empty section policy]] even states how "[p]age sections are not meant to just be hyperlinks," and that definitely shouldn't only apply to the sections at the bottom of the page.


==== Removal of opposes ====
==== Removal of opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
"Other people also do it" is a bad reason to support anything. What do you have to say about the policy that I linked to? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 21:37, 28 November 2017 (EST)

Latest revision as of 22:33, December 5, 2017

Mario Party: The Top 100

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Mario Party: The Top 100 was nominated to be a featured article at 19:31, 28 November 2017 and passed at 15:42, 5 December 2017.


Support

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) I have written as much information as I could on this article, detailing everything that needs to be said about the game, writing about all the collection aspects, the board features from Minigame Match, and filling out red links to articles (like the Worlds in Minigame Island). I think the presentation of the article is close to matching Mario Party: Star Rush in terms of organization and the amount of content that is in the game and thus, I think this article is ready to be featured. If there any more improvements that could be made to the article, please let me know.
  2. YoshiStar28 (talk)
  3. Owencrazyboy9 (talk) Yeah, I agree. Another article that sets the standards for video game articles on this wiki! Basically, everything I said on the Star Rush featured article page applies here, too. Per all.
  4. Astro-Lanceur (talk) Baby Luigi is doing GREAT work on this article. per all.
  5. Courtney (talk) Keep up the great work. I love the article!
  6. Toadette the Achiever (talk) I have to say, I'm impressed with the article. Per all.
  7. Lcrossmk8 (talk) This looks like a good article, so yeah, I'll put my vote in for this one. Per all.
  8. LuigiMaster123 (talk) Kudos to Baby Luigi for doing all this work! Per all.
  9. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
  10. Marioguy (talk) This article is becoming more incredible everytime I see it! Per all.
  11. Flappy Bird (talk) Sure, why not?
  12. Whitey (talk) This article is very well-written and informative, especially for a game that was only released recently. Per all.
  13. A51 Trooper (talk) Per Whitey's reasoning.

Oppose

Removal of opposes

Comments

"Other people also do it" is a bad reason to support anything. What do you have to say about the policy that I linked to? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 21:37, 28 November 2017 (EST)