Talk:Chap: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Split both Chaps from each other== | ==Split both Chaps from each other== | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">SPLIT 14-0</span> | |||
Seriously? I find this case ridiculous. Why would 2 characters that are from SPM and have the same name be merged? They don't affiliate with each other in any ways. | Seriously? I find this case ridiculous. Why would 2 characters that are from SPM and have the same name be merged? They don't affiliate with each other in any ways. | ||
{{scroll box|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|UltraMario3000}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|UltraMario3000}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': June 26, 2011, 23:59 GMT | '''Deadline''': June 26, 2011, 23:59 GMT | ||
Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
::::We don't know what Nintendo was thinking. We don't know if it was an error, or if it was intentional to confuse players. With a lack of knowledge, we can't change it to Glim, so right now I think what Goomba suggested is fine. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 08:23, 12 June 2011 (EDT) | ::::We don't know what Nintendo was thinking. We don't know if it was an error, or if it was intentional to confuse players. With a lack of knowledge, we can't change it to Glim, so right now I think what Goomba suggested is fine. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 08:23, 12 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::::It probably was a mistake, but yeah, for consistency, we need to use the "Chap" names. Even in species where we split them based on having different names in other regions (and different appearances), they still use the first English name, but with different parentheses. I agree that calling one "Chap (green)" and the other "Chap (blue)" would work, but alternatively, their more specific location could be used: "Chap (second floor)" and "Chap (The Underwhere)". The latter seems more consistence with how we differentiate other things, but the former is just as clear about which is which (unless someone's got blue-yellow colour-blindness (a.k.a. tritanopia), but that's pretty rare). - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 15:05, 26 June 2011 (EDT) | :::::It probably was a mistake, but yeah, for consistency, we need to use the "Chap" names. Even in species where we split them based on having different names in other regions (and different appearances), they still use the first English name, but with different parentheses. I agree that calling one "Chap (green)" and the other "Chap (blue)" would work, but alternatively, their more specific location could be used: "Chap (second floor)" and "Chap (The Underwhere)". The latter seems more consistence with how we differentiate other things, but the former is just as clear about which is which (unless someone's got blue-yellow colour-blindness (a.k.a. tritanopia), but that's pretty rare). - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 15:05, 26 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
}} |
Revision as of 20:26, June 26, 2011
I thought I'd say here that these two characters are probably better off on the same article because they're so similar (they're both minor Flip-Flop Folk from Super Paper Mario who even appear in the same town) and don't really have much notability even together, but if anyone disagrees I guess we'll see what happens. YELLOWYOSHI398
Slim's counterpart (PAL version)
...is called Glim, not Chap. The guy in the bar is still called Chap. Avengah 13:59, 13 February 2010 (EST)
Split both Chaps from each other
Template:SettledTPP SPLIT 14-0
Seriously? I find this case ridiculous. Why would 2 characters that are from SPM and have the same name be merged? They don't affiliate with each other in any ways.
Proposer: UltraMario3000 (talk) Support
OpposeCommentsSo, what will we call the two articles? I mean, we can't put (Flipside), since they're both in Flipside, nor can we put (Super Paper Mario), since they're both in SPM. --Reversinator 21:21, 11 June 2011 (EDT) Will rename the one of the Chaps to Glim since one of they're names are that in the PAL version.--UM3000
|