From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search


Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Why is every papercraft boss grouped up here? They have enough information for their own pages. It’d be like if we merged the giant bosses in Bowser’s Inside Story or Dream Team just because they’re all big. Scrooge200 (talk) PMCS Mustard Cafe Sign.png 16:08, August 31, 2019 (EDT)

It's probably something no one's bothered to put forth the effort in questioning yet given how burnout-inducing the game is. But yeah, thy should be split. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 16:14, August 31, 2019 (EDT)
I'd still like a proposal for this, just to be clear of what should be split and what shouldn't. Toadette icon CTTT.pngFont of Archivist Toadette's signature(T|C) 16:22, August 31, 2019 (EDT)
According to proposal rules, proposals should only be made when there's a major disagreement about what to split, which this isn't. I support splitting. TheDarkStar Sprite of the Dark Star from Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story + Bowser Jr.'s Journey 16:25, August 31, 2019 (EDT)
I agree with splitting the bosses, and I also think that the (while conjectural) generic enemy Papercrafts should also be split. However, I do think that the general Papercraft page should stay explaining the mechanic and how it controls. Doomhiker (talk)Artwork of a Topmini from Super Mario Galaxy 18:30, August 31, 2019 (EDT)
Same with the playable Papercrafts too. Mario Sakuraba (talk) 00:03 September 01, 2019 (UK Time)
Oh yeah, those should be split too. Basically of all them should be split. Doomhiker (talk)Artwork of a Topmini from Super Mario Galaxy 19:07, August 31, 2019 (EDT)
Well if you don't mind, I might start working on that tomorrow. Mario Sakuraba (talk) 00:13 September 01, 2019 (UK Time)


Hello! I have noticed that the original website had printable templates, can they be posted on here still? Thank you!
The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk).