MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Removal of support/oppose votes: One of AfternoonLight's votes was removed on the Giant Bowser one.)
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}}
|nominated=23:55, 5 October 2016 (EDT)
'''Rawk Hawk became unfeatured at 15:06, 14 November 2016.'''
|passed=18:17, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
}}
==== Remove featured article status ====
==== Remove featured article status ====
#{{User|Time Turner}} The intro paragraph is literally two sentences long. Both the Background and Powers and Abilities sections suffer the same issues of brevity, and the section covering TTYD covers far more than necessary while not being particularly well-written (beyond the tense issues, the article wrings as much fluff as it can out of every moment, which is to the article's detriment). Even if the writing was polished, there isn't much to be said about the character; there isn't enough content here to actually justify touting it as one of the wiki's best.
#{{User|Time Turner}} The intro paragraph is literally two sentences long. Both the Background and Powers and Abilities sections suffer the same issues of brevity, and the section covering TTYD covers far more than necessary while not being particularly well-written (beyond the tense issues, the article wrings as much fluff as it can out of every moment, which is to the article's detriment). Even if the writing was polished, there isn't much to be said about the character; there isn't enough content here to actually justify touting it as one of the wiki's best.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Time Turner
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Time Turner
#{{User|AfternoonLight}} Per both. Let's get rid of it.
#{{User|Alex95}} One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article.
#{{User|Alex95}} One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article.
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} Per all
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} Per all
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} By today's standards, this article will struggle to get featured. I think it's mainly hampered by paddy writing, but I'm still sort of open on the idea that short articles like this one can be featured.


==== Keep featured article status ====
==== Keep featured article status ====
#{{User|The RPG Gamer}} This article explains Rawk Hawk's traits perfectly and has a lot of information on him, no section of the article needs to be rewritten either so I don't see anything wrong in having it featured.


==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
'''The RPG Gamer'''
#{{User|Time Turner}} The oppose vote only addresses the issue of poor writing, although it only claims that it doesn't need to be rewritten despite it not having changed this entire time. It does not address the issue of brevity and the issue of fluff.
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} Vague at best vote.
#{{user|Shokora}} Per above.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} per all
'''AfternoonLight'''
#{{User|The RPG Gamer}} User is currently blocked.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 16:39, May 16, 2018

Rawk Hawk[edit]

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Rawk Hawk became unfeatured at 15:06, 14 November 2016.

Remove featured article status[edit]

  1. Time Turner (talk) The intro paragraph is literally two sentences long. Both the Background and Powers and Abilities sections suffer the same issues of brevity, and the section covering TTYD covers far more than necessary while not being particularly well-written (beyond the tense issues, the article wrings as much fluff as it can out of every moment, which is to the article's detriment). Even if the writing was polished, there isn't much to be said about the character; there isn't enough content here to actually justify touting it as one of the wiki's best.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk) Per Time Turner
  3. Alex95 (talk) One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article.
  4. 3D Player 2010 (talk) Per all
  5. Bazooka Mario (talk) By today's standards, this article will struggle to get featured. I think it's mainly hampered by paddy writing, but I'm still sort of open on the idea that short articles like this one can be featured.

Keep featured article status[edit]

Removal of support/oppose votes[edit]

Comments[edit]