MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bob-omb (Paper Mario: The Origami King): Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Advanced mobile edit |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=12:11, July 30, 2021 (EST) | |nominated=12:11, July 30, 2021 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=12:11, 28 September 2021 (EST) | ||
|nosupport=false | |||
}} | }} | ||
This article, in my eyes, is in pretty good condition. The opening paragraph is great, there are sections on his background and overall history, a recently added personality section, and plenty of images in the gallery and trivia. All in all, it seems like everything is there for a page on an ally in a ''Paper Mario'' game. However, if there are any objections or comments on this article, I can add them as soon as possible. | This article, in my eyes, is in pretty good condition. The opening paragraph is great, there are sections on his background and overall history, a recently added personality section, and plenty of images in the gallery and trivia. All in all, it seems like everything is there for a page on an ally in a ''Paper Mario'' game. However, if there are any objections or comments on this article, I can add them as soon as possible. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|The Mansion}} Per reasoning above. | #{{User|The Mansion}} Per reasoning above. | ||
#{{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} Ditto ^^^ I agree with him and I have the same reasoning. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|TasteTheFiresOfHelp}} As much as I love Bobby this article is fairly short, which is why it is getting my oppose vote. | |||
#{{User|Wikiboy10}} This article is way too short. I never played the game and I am fairly neutral on this getting passed but the length is what kills it. [http://index.php?title=Special:LongPages&limit=1000&offset=0 The top 1,000 articles don't include this article.] | |||
#{{User|RHG1951}} As with the others, the length of the article is the reason why I oppose. | |||
==== Removal of opposes ==== | ==== Removal of opposes ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I still think the images of his backstory would be better suited for the gallery section. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 13:35, July 30, 2021 (EDT) | I still think the images of his backstory would be better suited for the gallery section. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 13:35, July 30, 2021 (EDT) | ||
It'd be a good idea to describe his interactions with Olivia under the personality section. Also, I find it a bit repetitive to end each flashback image with "in his flashback." I think the article could also use a few more quotes, most importantly the long one before his death. {{User:Scrooge200/sig}} 14:59, July 30, 2021 (EDT) | |||
Not sure about this one. I think this one skedaddles the length requirement a bit too much for my liking; it doesn't comfortably pass the grade for me. Keep in mind, I know that Krunch is featured too but honestly, had I been active then, I would have opposed its nomination for the same reasons. {{User:Ray Trace/sig}} 11:41, August 2, 2021 (EDT) | |||
I understand. I can add some memorable quotes, maybe add a section to general information on his purposes in battle. {{User:The Mansion/sig}} 12:24, August 2, 2021 (EDT) | |||
@TasteTheFiresOfHelp You put your vote in the "Removal of Oppose" section BTW [[User:Somethingone|Somethingone]] ([[User talk:Somethingone|talk]]) 08:41, August 13, 2021 (EDT) | |||
@WikiBoy10 You made the same mistake I did, which was putting your oppose vote in the Removal of Opposes section. {{User|TasteTheFiresOfHelp}}, 19:43, August 13, 2021 (EST) | |||
I think it’s a good idea if we increase the size of the article but I still give the supporting vote. {{User|OhoJeeOnFire}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:57, October 1, 2021
Bob-omb (Paper Mario: The Origami King)[edit]
This article, in my eyes, is in pretty good condition. The opening paragraph is great, there are sections on his background and overall history, a recently added personality section, and plenty of images in the gallery and trivia. All in all, it seems like everything is there for a page on an ally in a Paper Mario game. However, if there are any objections or comments on this article, I can add them as soon as possible.
Support[edit]
- The Mansion (talk) Per reasoning above.
- OhoJeeOnFire (talk) Ditto ^^^ I agree with him and I have the same reasoning.
Oppose[edit]
- TasteTheFiresOfHelp (talk) As much as I love Bobby this article is fairly short, which is why it is getting my oppose vote.
- Wikiboy10 (talk) This article is way too short. I never played the game and I am fairly neutral on this getting passed but the length is what kills it. The top 1,000 articles don't include this article.
- RHG1951 (talk) As with the others, the length of the article is the reason why I oppose.
Removal of opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I still think the images of his backstory would be better suited for the gallery section. 
Nightwicked Bowser 
13:35, July 30, 2021 (EDT)
It'd be a good idea to describe his interactions with Olivia under the personality section. Also, I find it a bit repetitive to end each flashback image with "in his flashback." I think the article could also use a few more quotes, most importantly the long one before his death. Scrooge200 (talk) 
14:59, July 30, 2021 (EDT)
Not sure about this one. I think this one skedaddles the length requirement a bit too much for my liking; it doesn't comfortably pass the grade for me. Keep in mind, I know that Krunch is featured too but honestly, had I been active then, I would have opposed its nomination for the same reasons. 
Ray Trace(T|C) 11:41, August 2, 2021 (EDT)
I understand. I can add some memorable quotes, maybe add a section to general information on his purposes in battle. 
Green Star 12:24, August 2, 2021 (EDT)
@TasteTheFiresOfHelp You put your vote in the "Removal of Oppose" section BTW Somethingone (talk) 08:41, August 13, 2021 (EDT)
@WikiBoy10 You made the same mistake I did, which was putting your oppose vote in the Removal of Opposes section. TasteTheFiresOfHelp (talk), 19:43, August 13, 2021 (EST)
I think it’s a good idea if we increase the size of the article but I still give the supporting vote. OhoJeeOnFire (talk)
