Would you please use the "Show preview" button next to the "Save page" button before saving, so that you can do more in one edit? If you click save and then realize you made a mistake, please mark the later edits of that page as minor. Bop1996 (Talk)
Hello. Nice job on your recent uploads, but please remember to categorize the images by the game it appears in. For example, when uploading simply add
[[Category:Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels Images]] to the file page. Thanks for reading.
It’s been awhile since you were reminded about this, but please remember to add categories, as your recent uploads were missing Category:BS Super Mario Collection Images. --TheFlameChomp (talk) 09:31, March 16, 2019 (EDT)
It's just a coincidence as far as I know. BTW the older name that I used to use was Mariofan2020. Even more similar, ain't it? --Mariofan5000 (talk) 05:45, 10 May 2014 (EDT)
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mariofan5000 (talk).
|Please stop reverting an administrator's edit on the Super Mario Wiki. This isn't a warning, and it's possible that you made a mistake by accident or without realizing it; this is simply a reminder for your information. If the action continues, then a warning will be issued. Thanks for reading and keep contributing.|
If this reminder was not issued by an administrator or patroller and you feel it was undeserved, you may appeal it.
- Sorry to turn up to this thing late, but it's not against the rules to undo an admin's edit. Granted if you have an issue with an admin's edit you should try and bring it up with them instead of just undoing it, but this is slightly undeserved. Yoshi876 (talk)
BS Mario Collection Week 4
Since you went and undid my certain edits for BS Super Mario Collection so quickly, guess I should explain myself. I got the impression that dai-4-shuu is The Lost Levels based on these two sites that say so. The former even says part 4 has warps like part 1. Besides, there's no indication for all worlds or levels from each game being playable (warps excluded). SmokedChili (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
Even though those two sites say so, they also say there is no proof (the former says it's an estimate and the latter says "presumably") it would probably be best to just say there is nothing known about it, even if those sites say it was The Lost Levels, there's no proof that it was that or SMB3. --Mariofan5000 (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
- Maybe, but further research led to find out this came from the Japanese forum 2chan (it's like 4chan) where The Lost Levels is listed as week 4 entry. And those sites' estimations about the worlds is not the same as saying there is no proof of it being TLL, they just say there's no proof of the worlds themselves. SmokedChili (talk) 06:35, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
- Finally, why would SMB3 for the third time be far more likely for week 4 installment than TLL when the latter has people (Japanese included) saying it's the latter and even mentioning warping which isn't possible in SMB3 weeks, while the former only has the theories? SmokedChili (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2017 (EDT)
Any particular reason why you reverted the map images? There's not much of a difference aside from map layout. Having the secret area connect to where you get to them from I think is a better option. 11:51, October 25, 2019 (EDT)