I think this page should not be redirected to the Grubba article. Instead, this article should include information about the form of Grubba known as Macho Grubba. Just as the alternate forms of Mario deserve their own article (like Baby Mario), so do the alternate forms of Grubba. -- Son of Suns
- Actually, Grubba and Macho Grubba are kind of the same... Oh, let's see, who else got a Macho form? Bowser did in Paper Mario, didn't he? I'd actually have to say this should redirect to Grubba.--Dreyfus2006 11:58, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
- Agreed because essentially Grubba and Macho are same person, like Mr. L and Luigi. MERGE! XzelionETC
Yeah, I agree...Knife (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
I agree with Son of Suns since other forms have their same article, we can't be inconsistent.
But we can't be inconsistent, Mr. L is with Luigi because they have the same powers, but Macho Grubba has different powers than Grubba. 14:59, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Look, someone make a proposal. Max2 (talk)
Hmm... another one? Aww... man.Knife (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
The attack patterns that Macho Grubba looks bad. Whoever put the 6 attacks needs some proof that Macho Grubba can execute them. Otherwise the 3 attacks that I have put there needs to stay. --ChaosXIII 21:13, 7 January 2010 (EST)
But why is this the only boss page with a list of attacks? ~Darkfawful2~
why does 'backflip' redirect here?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk).
That's exactly what I was thinking.
—28 July 2013 2:52 EDT—
The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.127.116.11 (talk).
I have absolutely NO idea. I was reading that and going, 'Wha-??' I'm not sure if anyone DIDN'T wonder why. - Isjee594 (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2013 (EDT)