Talk:Stage: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Very well, I've thought of an even better idea that I could use...)
Line 4: Line 4:
I propose that we merge all of the stages from SSBB, SSBM and SSB into [[Stage]] as most of these articles are either short or stubs. The new page would look something like [[User:Marioguy1/Test|this]] and it would combine a lot of useful information into one page.
I propose that we merge all of the stages from SSBB, SSBM and SSB into [[Stage]] as most of these articles are either short or stubs. The new page would look something like [[User:Marioguy1/Test|this]] and it would combine a lot of useful information into one page.


{{scroll box|content=
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Marioguy1}}
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Marioguy1}}
'''Deadline:''' January 24th, 2010 (18:00 EST)
'''Deadline:''' January 24th, 2010 (18:00 EST)
Line 24: Line 23:
::Only in the comments section. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
::Only in the comments section. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}


Imagine the lag it will cause. And also, some, but not all, stages are highly detailed...--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}}}
Imagine the lag it will cause. And also, some, but not all, stages are highly detailed...--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}

Revision as of 20:21, December 27, 2011

Merge all Stages into Stage

DELETED

I propose that we merge all of the stages from SSBB, SSBM and SSB into Stage as most of these articles are either short or stubs. The new page would look something like this and it would combine a lot of useful information into one page.

Proposer: Marioguy1 (talk) Deadline: January 24th, 2010 (18:00 EST)

Support

  1. Marioguy1 (talk) - This would combine all of the information into one easy page.

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) No. There is no reason to merge the stages. Also, in your test, I'm pretty sure there is a lot more info in the articles themselves. So in the end, you're just ruining articles. And one last thing: Did you not notice the other articles that have lots of information? Just because some of them don't have much information it doesn't mean that we should merge them all. It's like if all the enemy pages were short, and I'd want to merge them all. It just won't happen.
  2. Fawfulfury65 (talk) I looked through a few of these articles and none were stubs, and were at a reasonable length. Even if there are a lot of stubs, they can be expanded, of course. Like Reversinator said, no need to merge.
  3. War Of 1812 (talk) Per Falfulfury65

Comments

  1. Jjfs6mk&c (talk) Instead of creating a whole new page, why don't you create a list of stages in the Super Smash Bros series and a category of them.
Because this proposal was to delete some stubs... as far as I know. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

There are still the links to the articles >_> --TucayoSig.png The 'Shroom 21:26, 10 January 2010 (EST)

Wait, are we allowed to use sigs here? Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Only in the comments section. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Imagine the lag it will cause. And also, some, but not all, stages are highly detailed...--FREAK ~Game GameBros.png Freak~ OUT!