MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario 64 DS: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
YoshiEgg1990 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) | |nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=19:36, 19 August 2018 (EDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} As the person who added the rewrite template, I'm going to say it ''needs'' that rewrite. | #{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} As the person who added the rewrite template, I'm going to say it ''needs'' that rewrite. | ||
#{{User|YoshiEgg1990}} The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, [[:File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png]] has {{tem|image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{tem|more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now. | #{{User|YoshiEgg1990}} The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, [[:File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png]] has {{tem|image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{tem|more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all (sadly). Standard should follow [[Mario Party: Star Rush]], [[Mario Party: The Top 100]], any GameCube Mario Party article ([[Mario Party 6]] and [[Mario Party 7]] especially) and even [[Mario Party: Island Tour]]. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 19:36, August 19, 2018
Super Mario 64 DS
Remove featured article status
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) This article may be well-written on the surface, but it's lacking content-wise in several sections. For one, the VS mode section, while it does provide good detail about the mode, it lacks images for it. Another problem is the {{rewrite}} template found in the changes section, and for a good reason too: all of the changes listed are randomly ordered with no separate sections for graphical, quote, story, etc. Lastly, the reception section is the worst offender, largely because it has nothing but sales information. Yeah. There is literally nothing for critical reception other than "Super Mario 64 DS received positive reviews yada yada" plastered over absolutely nothing. At least the sales data is informative enough. There's not much else wrong with this article, but the critical reception is something very influential to the game that's utterly neglected here.
- WeirdDave13 (talk) Per Toadette the Achiever.
- Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) As the person who added the rewrite template, I'm going to say it needs that rewrite.
- YoshiEgg1990 (talk) The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png has {{image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per all (sadly). Standard should follow Mario Party: Star Rush, Mario Party: The Top 100, any GameCube Mario Party article (Mario Party 6 and Mario Party 7 especially) and even Mario Party: Island Tour. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating.
