MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Star Piece (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "Trainiax" to "The Super Mario Super User") |
|||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}} | ||
'''Star Piece (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars)''' was nominated to be unfeatured at 02:23, 20 July 2014 and passed at 07:57, 30 August 2014. | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|Mario}} It's an article with ''bleh'' presentation. The writing is subpar as well, kind of fluffy. There's a lot of empty space, padding the article to make it appear lengthy. And yes, presentation does matter since [[Super Mario Galaxy]] got [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario Galaxy|unfeatured]] because it looks like crap and has eh writing. Overall, the article is just standard, nothing too special to have it featured. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Mario. It's ----tily written. | |||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per both, I also think the article is too short. | |||
#{{User|Vommack}} Per Mario and BL. | |||
#{{User|The Super Mario Super User}} Per Mario and Baby Luigi. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
I put a question on your talk. | I put a question on your talk. | ||
@Joseph Really? That's your vote why? {{User:Randombob-omb4761/sig}} | |||
Yay! I'm winning! [[User:Joseph|Joseph]] ([[User talk:Joseph|talk]]) 17:12, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
:Not necessarily. In order for your unfeature to pass, it must have exactly no opposition. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 17:15, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
::Randombob-omb4761 has no ground to stand on, so I think we can safely remove the vote if the user doesn't respond. But, yes, Joseph, you are making progress nevertheless. {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:20, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::Making progress, but not from your reasoning. - {{User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 17:24, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:15, June 30, 2021
Star Piece (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars)[edit]
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Star Piece (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars) was nominated to be unfeatured at 02:23, 20 July 2014 and passed at 07:57, 30 August 2014.
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- Mario (talk) It's an article with bleh presentation. The writing is subpar as well, kind of fluffy. There's a lot of empty space, padding the article to make it appear lengthy. And yes, presentation does matter since Super Mario Galaxy got unfeatured because it looks like crap and has eh writing. Overall, the article is just standard, nothing too special to have it featured.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Mario. It's ----tily written.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per both, I also think the article is too short.
- Vommack (talk) Per Mario and BL.
- The Super Mario Super User (talk) Per Mario and Baby Luigi.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Uhh... It's a Disambiguation that isn't even featured. I'll fix it for u. - 
02:25, 20 July 2014 (EDT)
- You didn't even formate this page correctly.I'll try to fix it. - 02:30, 20 July 2014 (EDT)
- It's fixed. By the way, this isn't the best article in the world, but it's featured for a reason, and unless someone gives a better reason than "It doesn't have much relevance to the wiki", than I ain't' changing my mind. - 02:40, 20 July 2014 (EDT)
- It's fixed. By the way, this isn't the best article in the world, but it's featured for a reason, and unless someone gives a better reason than "It doesn't have much relevance to the wiki", than I ain't' changing my mind. -
I put a question on your talk.
@Joseph Really? That's your vote why? ~~ Boo4761
Yay! I'm winning! Joseph (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
- Not necessarily. In order for your unfeature to pass, it must have exactly no opposition.
Ray Trace(T|C) 17:15, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
- Randombob-omb4761 has no ground to stand on, so I think we can safely remove the vote if the user doesn't respond. But, yes, Joseph, you are making progress nevertheless.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:20, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
- Making progress, but not from your reasoning. - 17:24, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
- Making progress, but not from your reasoning. -
- Randombob-omb4761 has no ground to stand on, so I think we can safely remove the vote if the user doesn't respond. But, yes, Joseph, you are making progress nevertheless.
