MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/New Super Mario Bros. Mii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
Akfamilyhome (talk | contribs) m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
#{{User|LightningBlue}} First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point. | #{{User|LightningBlue}} First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point. | ||
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead. | #{{User|Mariobros1985}} This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead. | ||
#{{User|Akfamilyhome}} Wow, seriously? I mean, this is a page about a TECH DEMO, with EXTREMELY LITTLE PIECE OF INFORMATION, with JUST A LIST OF CHARACTERS, ENEMIES AND OBJECTS. Per all. This really should not be a featured article. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 08:12, September 6, 2012
New Super Mario Bros. Mii
Support
Oppose
- GreenDisaster (talk) First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured list, that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go.
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GreenDisaster. If I felt like it, I bet I could correctly count the amout of words on this article.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it
- Bloc Partier (talk) - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list.
- Mario jc (talk) Per all.
- Lakituthequick (talk) Le per all.
- MeritC (talk) Wha...? No. Just no. This even wouldn't fit criteria to be a featured article at all.
- Master R.O.B (talk) Nothing I can say that the other opposers haven't already said.
- YoshiKong (talk) Doesn't seem wonderful, nor feature standard to any extent. Per all.
- Exo (talk) Per all. There's nothing on this page!
- LuigiBlubber (talk) This shouldn't become featured! It's a tech demo!
- Tails777 (talk) Per all, it's not really even an article, it's just a list of things that would have been in a game.
- The 463 (talk) To be honest, I don't see the point in this being here. maybe on the mario wikia, but not here. Let alone it being a featured article here.
- Koopa K (talk) It is too short.
- World10 (talk) All per.
- LightningBlue (talk) First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point.
- Mariobros1985 (talk) This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead.
- Akfamilyhome (talk) Wow, seriously? I mean, this is a page about a TECH DEMO, with EXTREMELY LITTLE PIECE OF INFORMATION, with JUST A LIST OF CHARACTERS, ENEMIES AND OBJECTS. Per all. This really should not be a featured article.
