MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
#{{User:RAP/sig}} – Whoa, that much dirt on one part. And the references that contain "Big Eight", *makes a thumbs-down* DE-LATED!!!!!!!! | #{{User:RAP/sig}} – Whoa, that much dirt on one part. And the references that contain "Big Eight", *makes a thumbs-down* DE-LATED!!!!!!!! | ||
#{{User:Stumpers/sig}}I say we kick its big, eight butts out of the Wiki! Go, Fixitup! (but you gotta admit, I helped weaken it earlier... :D) | #{{User:Stumpers/sig}}I say we kick its big, eight butts out of the Wiki! Go, Fixitup! (but you gotta admit, I helped weaken it earlier... :D) | ||
#[[User:Walkazo|PP]] WOO! FIRE! besides, I don't consider toad good enough, KILL THE BIG 8, (but please spare bowser, luigi, peach, well everyone but toad and Bowser's mustachioed arch enemy). chuckle. | |||
==== Nah Leave The Fanon ==== | ==== Nah Leave The Fanon ==== |
Revision as of 19:18, August 24, 2007
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. New FeaturesMarioWiki: ChronologyThis is a proposal to impliment a new writing policy that would give order to writing about Mario's fictional universe. MarioWiki: Chronology provides a framework for writing about Mario's "history", as well as settle disputes about where to place items in a chronology. Proposer: Son of Suns Add
Don't AddCommentsRemovalsThe Terrible Big FandomOk people, I'm just sick and tired of even seeing the words "Big Eight". The article is totally nothing but fanon cruft. I think we should just get rid of the article and any mentioning of it within other articles. When you look at it this way all the article is saying is "Uh ok these eight characters appeared playable in early spin-offs before other people and a lot of them are used a lot in their own games or a mainstream game so they are the most important eight characters and since a lot of people think so it is a fact.". Maybe I'm exaggerating, but I don't think so. Oh and, no adding or removing of any characters could fix this thing. WE MUST DESTROY IT WITH FIRE (no not literally) Proposer: Fixitup Kill It
Nah Leave The FanonCommentsWhile some characters are obliviousy important than other, deciding who is a Big Eight and who is not is more of an opinion than anything. Per example, do Toad really qualify? Sure, he have his own game... but all he do nodaway is appearing in some spinoff. I don't see the point in it, anyway. Gofer
Trouble CenterFace it, folks. The Trouble Center has been rarely used in 2007 after an initial burst, I don't think at all this summer. It's meant for newbies or the experienced to get article help where they cannot, such as knowledge of classic or obscure games. But, both of these kinds of members have fallen through: very few newbs become full members here and usually ask a veteran instead or don't have any questions for article content; veterans work at what they are strongest OR are more involved in sub-communities such as Fantendo or Userpedia instead. Our community is just not big enough to sustain the ideal function that was set last year. Oh well, but we would survive. Proposer: Wa Drop It
Try a Comeback
Commentsum... veterans leavig is true. and that the Trouble Center is like never used... and the fact that some of our users spend way more time at other wikis... but we're sure as heck not low on community! Max2 (talk)
ChangesNone currently SplitsOne of the most common proposals, related to splitting one article into multiple ones. MergesNone currently MiscellaneousNone currently |