MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Sir Grodus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Booderdash (talk | contribs) (deleted on accident) |
m (→Remove Featured Article Status: Temporarily banned user) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | #{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | ||
#{{User|Blakzer}} It is pretty much what Booderdash said. | #{{User|Blakzer}} It is pretty much what Booderdash said. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} I have six reasons for supporting this article's unfeaturing, 1. There is a template at the top 2. The start is terrible 3. It's like the Shadow Queen article 4. his office has nothing to do with the character 5. The Super Paper Mario section should be trivia 6. Some of the images suck. | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} I have six reasons for supporting this article's unfeaturing, 1. There is a template at the top 2. The start is terrible 3. It's like the Shadow Queen article 4. his office has nothing to do with the character 5. The Super Paper Mario section should be trivia 6. Some of the images suck. | ||
Revision as of 04:05, August 1, 2010
Sir Grodus
Remove Featured Article Status
- Booderdash (talk) Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure.
- Blakzer (talk) It is pretty much what Booderdash said.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) I have six reasons for supporting this article's unfeaturing, 1. There is a template at the top 2. The start is terrible 3. It's like the Shadow Queen article 4. his office has nothing to do with the character 5. The Super Paper Mario section should be trivia 6. Some of the images suck.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Is there really anything else that could be said about Grodus in the Super Paper Mario section? The Grodus Chronicles was the only reference to him that was made in the game. SolarBlaze (talk)
No, it shouldn't even be a section, it should be in trivia. Doesn't really count as an appearnce, more like an easter egg. Booderdash (talk)
