MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Sir Grodus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}} | ||
| | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | #{{User|Booderdash}} Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure. | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|Blakzer}} It is pretty much what Booderdash said. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} I have six reasons for supporting this article's unfeaturing, 1. There is a template at the top 2. The start is terrible 3. It's like the Shadow Queen article 4. his office has nothing to do with the character 5. The Super Paper Mario section should be trivia 6. Some of the images suck. | |||
#{{User|Fuzzipede27}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} There's that green template. Not only that, but the majority of the article is written in the passive voice. Bleh! We need the active voice. The passive voice is one reason that the article is so rambling Per all. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
:I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... {{User|Fawfulfury65}} | |||
Is there really anything else that could be said about Grodus in the ''Super Paper Mario'' section? ''[[The Grodus Chronicles]]'' was the only reference to him that was made in the game. {{User|SolarBlaze}} | |||
No, it shouldn't even be a section, it should be in trivia. Doesn't really count as an appearnce, more like an easter egg. | |||
{{User|Booderdash}} | |||
Yes, Grodus may be my favorite character in the game and i feel the need to defend him, but this article has too many faults, so it should be Unfeatured. | |||
{{User|GreenThunder}} | |||
Then vote for its removal. {{User|Booderdash}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:51, May 16, 2018
Sir Grodus[edit]
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- Booderdash (talk) Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure.
- Blakzer (talk) It is pretty much what Booderdash said.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) I have six reasons for supporting this article's unfeaturing, 1. There is a template at the top 2. The start is terrible 3. It's like the Shadow Queen article 4. his office has nothing to do with the character 5. The Super Paper Mario section should be trivia 6. Some of the images suck.
- Fuzzipede27 (talk) Per all.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) There's that green template. Not only that, but the majority of the article is written in the passive voice. Bleh! We need the active voice. The passive voice is one reason that the article is so rambling Per all.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... Fawfulfury65 (talk)
Is there really anything else that could be said about Grodus in the Super Paper Mario section? The Grodus Chronicles was the only reference to him that was made in the game. SolarBlaze (talk)
No, it shouldn't even be a section, it should be in trivia. Doesn't really count as an appearnce, more like an easter egg. Booderdash (talk)
Yes, Grodus may be my favorite character in the game and i feel the need to defend him, but this article has too many faults, so it should be Unfeatured. GreenThunder (talk)
Then vote for its removal. Booderdash (talk)
