MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Larry Koopa

From the Super Mario Wiki

Larry Koopa[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. PrincessJojora (talk) It's perfect... There are no errors, and what is possibly wrong with this page? Nothing! This page is absolutely perfect! It's ABSOLUTELY PERFECT! No stubs! And he's a cool Koopaling! (Just like Iggy Koopa!)
  2. raidpirate52 (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Mario (talk) Past tense litters the history section. The writing is also subpar ("who was determined to fight Mario for the wand as he knew the alternative would be Bowser loudly reprimanding him for failure"). Some sections of the article needs more detail (Leaping Lizards from Nintendo Adventure Books). Physical appearance is muddled with pointless details (like the yellow tan skin and a green head part). The section needs only the relevant details and comparisons, and it should analyze the appearance and changes of Larry over time. The "Personality and traits" might need some rewriting, with way too much usage of "utilize", a bad word. There isn't much mention of how Larry is the youngest sibling, so maybe some exploration on that part!? There's an empty section in the gallery section. Finally, the page can do a bit about our latest installment in the Super Smash Bros. series? So yeah, the article has a few flaws (so it's NOT perfect as claimed here) that really keep it from being featured.
  2. Ninelevendo (talk) This article lacks images in the personality section, yet has too much in the history section. The Adventures of Super Mario Bros 3 section is also a bit of an eyesore. The gallery and NSLU sections are also basically empty.
  3. Time Turner (talk) Per all. This article is not perfect, and your obsession with a character has no place when deciding on the quality of an article.
  4. 'Shroom64 (talk) Past tense, also, Bowser didn't reprimand Larry in SMB3 to anyone's knowledge. Not to mention missing SSB4. In other words, per Mario; fix the issues and I will gladly move my vote.
  5. Vommack (talk) Your obsession with the Koopalings has no bearing on the quality of the article, which in this case is most certainly not perfect. Per all.
  6. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per all.
  7. Viper26 (talk) Per all.
  8. Iggy Koopa777 (talk) Per all, this article is empty as a Brick Block, Has Info without a Relavance and well... full of Issues. So PER ALL! (But thanks for saying Iggy Koopa is cool he is my favorite too)

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

I fixed the majority of the problems here as far as I could tell. The pictures gave me problems, though, so that still needs to be fixed. -Non-member Keluvan

Thanks! I don't know who else will notice, but I'll fix the images problem then move my vote. BLuigiSluggers.PNGBabyLuigi64Corrin (SSB for N3DS - Wii U artwork).png
The past tense has been fixed, which I applaud you for, but none of the other problems, such as the subpar writing, the bloated general information section, and the empty section, have been fixed. Before jumping ship so quickly, make sure it's sturdy. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Well, that was my very first edit on this wiki, and I was a little worried about messing up. -Non-member Keluvan
I was hesitant myself when I noticed that Mario's sample quote was still there. I removed that, but yeah, next time, be sure to look through the list of problems in the oppose section before you say you fixed everything or almost everything. BLuigiSluggers.PNGBabyLuigi64Corrin (SSB for N3DS - Wii U artwork).png
Okay, I'll keep that in mind. I'm still trying to get a sense on how to write in the wiki. And I got myself an account! No, I'm not the one from WoW. -Keluvan (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2014 (EDT)