Talk:Tileoid

Should this article be deleted? It describes a purely hypothetical parent species, and I know we've deleted those in the past (though I can't think of any specific examples at the moment). -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 20:44, March 30, 2021 (EDT)

Another article like this is the Finley article. I think at best these articles could be converted into disambiguation pages. Nightwicked Bowser 20:53, March 30, 2021 (EDT)

Definitely delete. This is the exact same situation as Puff (species), and we all know how that went. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 21:00, March 30, 2021 (EDT)

What to do with this article

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Wednesday, May 22, 2024, 07:05 GMT

See comments above. While there's indeed no point in having an article on a hypothetical parent species, this one is unique in that no one member can easily be considered the obvious parent species. (You could argue that it would be Tileoid G, but that's still a bit of a stretch.) So then, what should we do with this article?

Proposer: Archivist Toadette (talk)
Deadline: April 14, 2021, 23:59 GMT

Delete

1. Archivist Toadette (talk) Second choice.

Convert to disambiguation page

1. Archivist Toadette (talk) Preferred option.
2. Waluigi Time (talk) Sure, why not.
3. Alex95 (talk) - Kind of already a disambig anyway.
4. Keyblade Master (talk) As I said above.
5. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
6. Hewer (talk) Per Alex95.

Comments

Should the same thing happen for Finley as well? Nightwicked Bowser 21:16, March 30, 2021 (EDT)

Not really, since in that case Blue Finleys are clearly meant to be the parent species, seeing as how Red Finleys are slightly less common, and Green Finleys are rather rare. ^(T|C) 21:21, March 30, 2021 (EDT)