Talk:Ninji: Difference between revisions
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (Geez, I can't believe I wrote so much.) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (I knew I was forgetting something...) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Split Giant Ninji from Ninji== | ==Split Giant Ninji from Ninji== | ||
{{TPP}} | |||
[[Talk:Giant Ninji#Merge into Ninji or make Giant Shy Guy article|Yes, I remember the proposal to merge Giant Ninji in the first place]]. I'm creating this proposal with the intention of correcting what that proposal did. The core reason behind this proposal is that Ninji and Giant Ninja are two separate enemies. I can't really go into much more detail than that. What I can offer, however, are examples. Besides the list that Garlic Man/Marcelagus created on the proposal I linked to (I am aware that half of the articles he linked to have been merged, but the other half still hasn't been merged), there are currently [[Talk:Whomp#Split Big Whomp from Whomp|two]] [[Talk:Carrot#Split Giga Carrot from Carrot|other]] porposals with similar intentions, though one is to split [[Giga Carrot]] from [[Carrot]] and the other is to split Big Whomp from [[Whomp]]. The only opposition one of those proposals received is not only incorrect, it has been easily countered. | [[Talk:Giant Ninji#Merge into Ninji or make Giant Shy Guy article|Yes, I remember the proposal to merge Giant Ninji in the first place]]. I'm creating this proposal with the intention of correcting what that proposal did. The core reason behind this proposal is that Ninji and Giant Ninja are two separate enemies. I can't really go into much more detail than that. What I can offer, however, are examples. Besides the list that Garlic Man/Marcelagus created on the proposal I linked to (I am aware that half of the articles he linked to have been merged, but the other half still hasn't been merged), there are currently [[Talk:Whomp#Split Big Whomp from Whomp|two]] [[Talk:Carrot#Split Giga Carrot from Carrot|other]] porposals with similar intentions, though one is to split [[Giga Carrot]] from [[Carrot]] and the other is to split Big Whomp from [[Whomp]]. The only opposition one of those proposals received is not only incorrect, it has been easily countered. | ||
Revision as of 14:01, September 21, 2012
8-bit?
"Strangely, the Ninji appear in 8-bits, even though the game is in 16-bits."
What does this mean? Does it mean they re-used the sprites from SMB2? That doesn't really mean the character "appears in 8-bits," which is a sort of nonsensical statement conflating the artwork with architecture. --Toadstool Forever 00:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Wrong pictures
I would like to point out that the display of PM style ninjis is just a bunch of unofficial recolors. ShyGuy27|Talk
Split Giant Ninji from Ninji
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, April 30, 2024, 12:49 GMT
Yes, I remember the proposal to merge Giant Ninji in the first place. I'm creating this proposal with the intention of correcting what that proposal did. The core reason behind this proposal is that Ninji and Giant Ninja are two separate enemies. I can't really go into much more detail than that. What I can offer, however, are examples. Besides the list that Garlic Man/Marcelagus created on the proposal I linked to (I am aware that half of the articles he linked to have been merged, but the other half still hasn't been merged), there are currently two other porposals with similar intentions, though one is to split Giga Carrot from Carrot and the other is to split Big Whomp from Whomp. The only opposition one of those proposals received is not only incorrect, it has been easily countered.
One final note: Not all short articles are stubs. Even if this turns out to be a short article, that still doesn't mean it will be a stub. Stubs are articles that are lacking information, not articles that are simply small.
Proposer: GreenDisaster (talk)
Deadline: October 5, 2012, 23:59 GMT
Split
- GreenDisaster (talk) Per my proposal.
