Talk:Metal Wario

While a fair bit of work went in to this article, it should be merged with Metal Mario, as Metal Wario has no unique traits of his own. -- Booster (talk)

Yes, I agree. — Stooben Rooben 19:07, 5 February 2009 (EST)

As do I. Fire Mario, Fire Luigi and Fire Wario all share one page, this should too. - Walkazo 19:16, 5 February 2009 (EST)

NO!!!! WE MUST MAKE METAL OLIMAR, FOX, AND FALCO 2!!! Just kidding. Go for the merge. BLOC PARTIER.

Wait. This merge doesn't make sense, as the term Metal Wario does not refer to all the characters Metal Mario refers to (i.e. they are not interchangeable, unlike say Tanooki Mario and Tanooki Luigi). -- Son of Suns (talk)

I agree with Son of Sons here, Metal Mario is really his own character as he has appeared in Mario Golf and other such games as an individual and is far different from Metal Wario who is simply a power-up.-User:Zedxclon

Metal Mario is his own unique character, like what Zedxclon and Son of Suns said.-Mr.C (talk)

While I agree that Metal Mario could be argued to be an independant character, the article also encompasses the "metal form" power-up available in Mario 64 which characters from the Smash Bros. Series can also assume. Because Metal Wario is just Wario using this same form within a remake of the original game it appeared in, I don't see why we can't just merge the articles for simplicity's sake. -Lurdiak (talk)

i totally agree it should be merged

it should be merged just like bomb mario and bomb wario is the same-t76ef

What about merging these too, and rename the page "Metal Form"?--User:Yoshieggs6

Although that idea sounds good, we would have to do the same for Fire Mario, Ice Mario, Rainbow Mario, Bee Mario, etc. We instead put the notice on the top that states the alternate names that can be used for the article (such as this one). · SMB (Talk) · 16:51, 19 July 2009 (EDT)