Talk:Mario Bros.-e

Merge

This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

As far as I know, the e-Reader games are exact ports of the NES games, so this should be merged with Mario Bros.. We also merged the Classic NES Series with the respective original games. --Grandy02 09:38, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Don't Merge it with the NES version. Dark Lakitu 789

this article is a stub so it should be merged into it KS3 (talk · contribute)

Just because something is a stub, it doesn't mean it needs to be merged. There's something called expanding, you know. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

This game is the same as the NES version, though, just on a different platform. There is no reason for a separate article. --Grandy02 09:36, 18 February 2010 (EST)

it should merge because it is considered as a remake of the game
The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperGamerX17 (talk).

I wouldn't even consider it a remake. It is just an emulation of the NES game. --Grandy02 12:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree to merge it. It is the EXACT SAME as the NES version, only on a GameBoy Advance E-Reader. Indeed, there is no reason for the E-Reader version to have it's own article. --Killer Axe

Merge

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, April 28, 2024, 19:13 GMT

As you can see in the comments above, this is mostly an emulation and not a remake. I propose that we should merge them.

Proposer:Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk)
Deadline: 15:12, 20 November 2010 GMT

Merge

1. Its-a-me Yoshi! (talk) Per Proposal.

Don't Merge

1. Fuzzipede27 (talk)

Comments

Remember this is an emulation. Its an exact port from the NES version. I can see why SMAS+SMW was split, but I can't see why this was split if its the same game on a different port.--Its-a-meYoshi!

We have an Article for Mario Party -e so we should keep this one. GalladeBlades