Talk:Flagman

Add topic
Active discussions

DeleteEdit

According to the comments in this proposal, this article (and I'm assuming Lion as well) was excluded because it's appeared in some form in other Mario games. However, those already have their own articles, so I don't see why these need to stay.   Mario JC 00:46, July 16, 2019 (EDT)

I believe the Flagman and Lion articles help people better understand the gameplay of the original Game & Watch games. The pages about their remakes talk about the gameplay in the Mario games, which can be slightly different. Dwhitney (talk) 17:39, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

By that logic you'd have to create pages for games every Nintendo-themed microgame is based on.   Mario JC 08:02, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
For consistency with the others, and since it has a substancial history, it should be turned into a redirect, but not merge the content themselves. --  FanOfYoshi 09:29, September 18, 2019 (EDT)
Yeah, I don't see the point of keeping this. I support deletion. --  Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 23:17, September 23, 2019 (EDT)
@FOY: Why would a substantial history factor into whether or not something should be deleted? A lot of pages have been deleted even with a substantial history. TheDarkStar   23:36, September 23, 2019 (EDT)

So...what is the deal here. Could we not merge some of the article into the actual mario related content it is used in of Game & Watch Gallery 3? Trig - 12:12, October 30, 2019 (EDT)
There's no reason to merge it since there's no Mario-related info to mention. For reference, see this proposal from earlier this year that resulted in the removal of several articles on Game & Watch games that weren't Mario-relevant. --  Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:24, October 30, 2019 (EDT)

I would just redirect the page. It has absolutely nothing to do with Mario. NintendogsFan (talk) 18:56, November 26, 2019 (EST)

Return to "Flagman" page.