MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario World: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} It's a fairly good article compared to some, but it still isn't that great either. It's outdated some of the info looked like it didn't follow the new articles policy. (Why is the intro of the GBA game there?) The items section has really flowery writing, (Turns him into <b>Caped</b> Mario?) and looks more like a guide than a wiki article. The world section is also bland, it's just a list of the worlds when it could be so much better. (Look [[New Super Luigi U#Worlds|here]] for example) Then the trivia is also too big, provided I did just slap the template there. The enemies and character section could also be much better and use more images. | #{{User|Ninelevendo}} It's a fairly good article compared to some, but it still isn't that great either. It's outdated some of the info looked like it didn't follow the new articles policy. (Why is the intro of the GBA game there?) The items section has really flowery writing, (Turns him into <b>Caped</b> Mario?) and looks more like a guide than a wiki article. The world section is also bland, it's just a list of the worlds when it could be so much better. (Look [[New Super Luigi U#Worlds|here]] for example) Then the trivia is also too big, provided I did just slap the template there. The enemies and character section could also be much better and use more images. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} Per Ninelevendo. It's a fairly strong article, but there are still some glaring flaws. | #{{User|Vommack}} Per Ninelevendo. It's a fairly strong article, but there are still some glaring flaws. | ||
#{{User|Mario}} The animated images need to be replaced, the story section sucks, the Yoshi section can be organized much better, the regional differences section is messy, and the critical reception section is disappointingly small, especially for such a "great" game. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:18, August 8, 2014
Super Mario World
Remove Featured Article Status
- Ninelevendo (talk) It's a fairly good article compared to some, but it still isn't that great either. It's outdated some of the info looked like it didn't follow the new articles policy. (Why is the intro of the GBA game there?) The items section has really flowery writing, (Turns him into Caped Mario?) and looks more like a guide than a wiki article. The world section is also bland, it's just a list of the worlds when it could be so much better. (Look here for example) Then the trivia is also too big, provided I did just slap the template there. The enemies and character section could also be much better and use more images.
- Vommack (talk) Per Ninelevendo. It's a fairly strong article, but there are still some glaring flaws.
- Mario (talk) The animated images need to be replaced, the story section sucks, the Yoshi section can be organized much better, the regional differences section is messy, and the critical reception section is disappointingly small, especially for such a "great" game.
Keep Featured Article Status
- Joseph (talk) The article gives nice information' I like the power ups and items section' nice writing' so I say don't unfeature.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Joeseph
- Vommack (talk) The vote doesn't address the issues that have been brought up; if anything, it claims that the flowery writing in the items section is something to be desired.
Comments
Looks like I will think at this soon. I'll wait until Lakitu will be Featured (or the nomination fails). 
TSUNAMI
- Altough Lakitu is a better article than this. He at least doesn't have a section saying: "Lakitu grabs this to become clouded Lakitu" -
16:56, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
