MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario 64 DS: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Mario 64 DS": Archive ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{fa-archive|unfeature=yes
|nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT)
|nominated=02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT)
|passed=19:36, 19 August 2018 (EDT)
|passed=19:36, 19 August 2018 (EDT)
Line 8: Line 8:
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} This article may be well-written on the surface, but it's lacking content-wise in several sections. For one, the VS mode section, while it ''does'' provide good detail about the mode, it lacks images for it. Another problem is the {{tem|rewrite}} template found in the changes section, and for a good reason too: all of the changes listed are randomly ordered with no separate sections for graphical, quote, story, etc. Lastly, the reception section is the worst offender, largely because it has nothing but sales information. Yeah. There is literally nothing for critical reception other than "''Super Mario 64 DS'' received positive reviews yada yada" plastered over absolutely nothing. At least the sales data is informative enough. There's not much else wrong with this article, but the critical reception is something very influential to the game that's utterly neglected here.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} This article may be well-written on the surface, but it's lacking content-wise in several sections. For one, the VS mode section, while it ''does'' provide good detail about the mode, it lacks images for it. Another problem is the {{tem|rewrite}} template found in the changes section, and for a good reason too: all of the changes listed are randomly ordered with no separate sections for graphical, quote, story, etc. Lastly, the reception section is the worst offender, largely because it has nothing but sales information. Yeah. There is literally nothing for critical reception other than "''Super Mario 64 DS'' received positive reviews yada yada" plastered over absolutely nothing. At least the sales data is informative enough. There's not much else wrong with this article, but the critical reception is something very influential to the game that's utterly neglected here.
#{{User|WeirdDave13}} Per Toadette the Achiever.
#{{User|WeirdDave13}} Per Toadette the Achiever.
#{{User|Doc von Schmeltwick}} As the person who added the rewrite template, I'm going to say it ''needs'' that rewrite.
#{{User|YoshiEgg1990}} The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, [[:File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png]] has {{tem|image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{tem|more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now.
#{{User|YoshiEgg1990}} The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, [[:File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png]] has {{tem|image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{tem|more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating.
Line 17: Line 16:


==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
'''Doc von Schmeltwick'''
#{{User|YoshiEgg1990}} The rewrite template has been removed.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per YoshiEgg1990
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per YoshiEgg1990.
#{{user|Mario jc}} Per all.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 21:58, August 27, 2018

Super Mario 64 DS

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario 64 DS was nominated to be unfeatured at 02:24, 17 August 2018 (EDT) and passed at 18:36, 26 August 2018.


Remove featured article status

  1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) This article may be well-written on the surface, but it's lacking content-wise in several sections. For one, the VS mode section, while it does provide good detail about the mode, it lacks images for it. Another problem is the {{rewrite}} template found in the changes section, and for a good reason too: all of the changes listed are randomly ordered with no separate sections for graphical, quote, story, etc. Lastly, the reception section is the worst offender, largely because it has nothing but sales information. Yeah. There is literally nothing for critical reception other than "Super Mario 64 DS received positive reviews yada yada" plastered over absolutely nothing. At least the sales data is informative enough. There's not much else wrong with this article, but the critical reception is something very influential to the game that's utterly neglected here.
  2. WeirdDave13 (talk) Per Toadette the Achiever.
  3. YoshiEgg1990 (talk) The issues Toadette mentioned were fixed by me, with a little help. However, there are still issues. The Trivia section seems too long, File:SM64DS Vs Mode.png has {{image-quality}}, and the article is tagged with {{more media}}. Therefore, i am going to support this for now.
  4. Baby Luigi (talk) Per all. Standards for what constitutes as a featured article have increased and this article is a relic of that time period that desperately needs updating.
  5. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
  6. Yoshi the SSM (talk) Shorten Trivia a bit so that it isn't appear as long. But, the other two issues remain, which I can't take care of even though I have the game.

Keep featured article status

Removal of support/oppose votes

Comments

For VS mode, afaik, melonDS is the only DS emulation that can potentially emulate multiplayer play. Otherwise, I think it's unfair tagging it for better image quality upload, because most emulators, including Desmume do not support multiplayer. BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C) 19:41, 19 August 2018 (EDT)

FYI, this was not taken from an emulator. It was taken from a Youtube video, like most of the images i upload. Blue Yoshi from Yoshi's Story Yoshi Egg 1990 Red Yoshi holding a Bumber 'Chute 19:45, 19 August 2018 (EDT)
I'd expect that, because again, it's next to impossible to emulate multiplayer. Hence why I think it's unfair to tag it with an image-quality image, since it's really difficult to get emulation quality images for multiplayer. BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C) 19:48, 19 August 2018 (EDT)