MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Bowser Jr.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{Fa-archive|nominated=22:58, 9 June 2011 (EDT)|passed=02:03, 19 July 2011 (EDT)|unfeature=yes}}
|nominated=22:58, 9 June 2011 (EDT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Bowser Jr. appeared in the cover in a Super Mario-Kun issue, which means he appeared there, so where is the information, since I never read it? The article is written more like a story rather than an article. And do I see a <nowiki>{{sectionstub}}</nowiki> somewhere?
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Bowser Jr. appeared in the cover in a Super Mario-Kun issue, which means he appeared there, so where is the information, since I never read it? The article is written more like a story rather than an article. And do I see a <nowiki>{{sectionstub}}</nowiki> somewhere?
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per LGM.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per LGM.
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per LGM.
#{{User|Mathew10}} Per LGM. This is a great article, but there's one stub at the Mario Power Tennis section.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Stub!
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} per above
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Per all. What I don't get is that I used the same reasoning for [[Petey Piranha]], but everyone opposed me.
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|MST3K}} Per above.
#{{User|Fallenprime11}} This article teaches about Bowser's right hand man, someone people should know about. I suggest it stays featured.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} No templ8s.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Fallenprime11'''
#{{User|Yoshiwaker}} - He didn't give a reason relating to the quality of the article.
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} - Per YW.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} - Per YW.
#{{user|Nicke8}} The Mario article isn't featured. Per all.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Per Yoshiwaker


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
The tense template has been removed. {{User|Mario4Ever}}
The tense template has been removed. {{User|Mario4Ever}}
@LGM: There is no <nowiki>{{sectionstub}}</nowiki> in the article. {{User|ThirdMarioBro}}
: It probably got fixed {{User|Nicke8}}
::Nope its right here [http://www.mariowiki.com/Bowser_Jr.#Mario_Power_Tennis] {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
don't worry I'll fix it {{User|GEX}} .
:::'''@DKPetey99''': The difference is that your only concern was the absence of a Super Mario Kun mention, a minor issue, while here, a major concern is how the article is written, which is a more important issue. {{User|Mario4Ever}}

Latest revision as of 03:58, May 17, 2018

Bowser Jr.

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Bowser Jr. was nominated to be unfeatured at 22:58, 9 June 2011 (EDT) and passed at 01:03, 26 July 2011.


Remove Featured Article Status

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Bowser Jr. appeared in the cover in a Super Mario-Kun issue, which means he appeared there, so where is the information, since I never read it? The article is written more like a story rather than an article. And do I see a {{sectionstub}} somewhere?
  2. UltraMario3000 (talk) Per LGM.
  3. Superfiremario (talk) Per LGM.
  4. Mathew10 (talk) Per LGM. This is a great article, but there's one stub at the Mario Power Tennis section.
  5. Mario Bros.! (talk) Stub!
  6. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) per above
  7. DKPetey99 (talk) Per all. What I don't get is that I used the same reasoning for Petey Piranha, but everyone opposed me.

Keep Featured Article Status

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

The tense template has been removed. Mario4Ever (talk)

@LGM: There is no {{sectionstub}} in the article. ThirdMarioBro (talk)

It probably got fixed Nicke8 (talk)
Nope its right here [1] Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)

don't worry I'll fix it GEX (talk) .

@DKPetey99: The difference is that your only concern was the absence of a Super Mario Kun mention, a minor issue, while here, a major concern is how the article is written, which is a more important issue. Mario4Ever (talk)