MarioWiki:Featured articles/N3/Super Mario Galaxy

Super Mario Galaxy

Support

1. YoshiFlutterJump (talk) Okay, time for operation "Feature Super Mario Galaxy, Revisit Redux" to come into effect! This is a well-written, detailed, organized article without improvement tags or red links. All complaints from its unfeaturement and its second featurement nomination have been satisfied, particularly the Gameplay section, which is now a lot more organized than it was before. Therefore I believe that this article meets FA standards and can rejoin the ranks of the featured articles. If there is anything wrong with the article, I will get it fixed.

Oppose

1. Time Turner (talk) The Characters and Enemies sections are still blobs of links, unlike the other sections.
2. Baby Luigi (talk) Intro can be expanded more, I feel. The reception section can be expanded and sources are required for that section. The characters and enemies section needs to have tables like Super Mario 3D World, so readers can know what a Petari is without having to click on the link (since many players don't own the guide or whatever and these enemies are never named in-game)
3. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.

Comments

There are over 70 enemies/obstacles in this game. Listing them all out with a simple list or even a gallery seems insufficient, the former lacks pictures and the latter would be mega-enormous. I have been gathering some images from (comparatively) high-quality YouTube videos, but the issue of organization is still key to all of this. I have devised a few methods here, if anyone's interested. The first way allows for an information blurb, and the second way takes up little space and can be easily changed when the inevitable shuffling regarding "Fish Bone," "Mechakoopa," and Gringill occurs. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2018 (EST)

Second chart goes off the screen on my end. 00:44, 8 March 2018 (EST)

What's your browser magnification at? I was considering lowering the amount by two or four anyways.... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2018 (EST)

1280x1040, which I know is narrow. But chances are someone may have a screen similar or smaller, and the chart won't be helpful on mobile view. I'd say use the first option if a short summary is necessary. Otherwise, I think a simple gallery will do. 00:47, 8 March 2018 (EST)