MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Princess Peach: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Support: ummm... I'm sorry Merit, but per the new rules, we shouldn't add comments to the votes :/)
Line 16: Line 16:
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} This has the same problem as Mario; she made appearances in a whole bunch of games, that it's difficult to site them all (Wrecking Crew '98? Game & Watch Galleries 1,2, and 4?). Plus, sections are badly categorized (New Super Mario Bros. installments?). Plus, it's badly organized, with television appearances smack in the middle of the games appearances. Also, greatly in need of images with some sections. And do we really need a list of appearances section? No other article that I know has that.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} This has the same problem as Mario; she made appearances in a whole bunch of games, that it's difficult to site them all (Wrecking Crew '98? Game & Watch Galleries 1,2, and 4?). Plus, sections are badly categorized (New Super Mario Bros. installments?). Plus, it's badly organized, with television appearances smack in the middle of the games appearances. Also, greatly in need of images with some sections. And do we really need a list of appearances section? No other article that I know has that.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The history section is badly organized. This article suffers the same problem as Mario. Per UglyThingamajigWithHisStupidFatButtOnFire.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The history section is badly organized. This article suffers the same problem as Mario. Per UglyThingamajigWithHisStupidFatButtOnFire.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Its got Spin-off games placed before games such as the Mario & Luigi series. And Super Princess Peach takes forever to find. In short: To messed up to be a featured article.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Revision as of 02:07, March 4, 2010

Princess Peach

Support

  1. KS3 (talk) It is a good quality, understandable article.
  2. Mr. Anon (talk)
  3. Byllant (talk)
  4. MeritC (talk)

Oppose

  1. Mr bones (talk) - It is an interesting article but there's almost no screenshots of the old games.
  2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This has the same problem as Mario; she made appearances in a whole bunch of games, that it's difficult to site them all (Wrecking Crew '98? Game & Watch Galleries 1,2, and 4?). Plus, sections are badly categorized (New Super Mario Bros. installments?). Plus, it's badly organized, with television appearances smack in the middle of the games appearances. Also, greatly in need of images with some sections. And do we really need a list of appearances section? No other article that I know has that.
  3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The history section is badly organized. This article suffers the same problem as Mario. Per UglyThingamajigWithHisStupidFatButtOnFire.
  4. Commander Code-8 (talk) Its got Spin-off games placed before games such as the Mario & Luigi series. And Super Princess Peach takes forever to find. In short: To messed up to be a featured article.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

Television appearances are in the middle of the games because as far is I know all of the appearances should be organized by series in release date order and that includes cartoon series, we are not separating anymore appearances by games, cartoons... And the list of appearances is not only used in this article, other articles such as Princess Daisy and Dixie Kong also use it and they are featured articles. Javier12345 20:11, 28 February 2010 (EST)