MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Paper Mario: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Triva section overly long. Eldstar image is different from the others. I will try to relocate trivia, but i cant do anything about the image.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Revision as of 22:35, December 1, 2009

Paper Mario

Support

  1. Redstar (talk)- The article is well-written, contains information of all chapters in the game, features an in-depth discussion of game mechanics and characters, has a balanced amount of images, and has all necessary information split to their correct pages. This page simply cannot be improved much more than it already has.
  2. Fawfulfury65 (talk)- Enough images and info.
  3. MATEOELBACAN (talk)- Per All, this has tons of info and images,must be a FA.
  4. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I really don't see anything wrong with this article (other than a few minor grammar errors). It has plentiful pictures, and it has everything to be a featured image.

Oppose

  1. Tucayo (talk) - Triva section overly long. Eldstar image is different from the others. I will try to relocate trivia, but i cant do anything about the image.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

As per Fawfulfury65's vote-for-oppose, an image has been added to the Ending section. As for the "Construction Template", it's actually a request for more images. The article itself is as complete as it can get, and images simply won't improve what's already there. While more images would be nice to have in the Gallery, most of the Paper Mario-related images are already there so the lack of images to use should hold no bearing on this proposal. Redstar 09:26, 29 November 2009 (EST)

Yes but you can't have any rewrite, construction, additional images, overly long section, etc templates because that means that the article has been requested to be improved. Just add more and I'll support. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
I added as many images as I could come up with, but, unfortunately, there wasn't much release-artwork that went with this game. Redstar 10:17, 29 November 2009 (EST)