MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Removing redundant category) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=15:18, 4 April 2014 (EST) | |nominated=15:18, 4 April 2014 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=20:18, 4 May 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#<s>{{User|Baby Luigi}} Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.</s> | #<s>{{User|Baby Luigi}} Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.</s> | ||
#<s>{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty | #<s>{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty sections|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.</s> | ||
#{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section. | #{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section. | ||
#{{User|Fandro}} Per Mario and Vommack. | #{{User|Fandro}} Per Mario and Vommack. | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
; | ;Vommack | ||
#{{User|Mario}} The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid. | #{{User|Mario}} The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid. | ||
;Fandro | |||
#{{User|Stonehill}} ...which makes ''this'' vote invalid too. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT) | I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:54, February 9, 2017
Blooper[edit]
Support[edit]
- bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.
Oppose[edit]
Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.- Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
- Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.
Removal of Opposes[edit]
- Vommack
- Mario (talk) The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid.
- Fandro
Comments[edit]
I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT)
@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT)
