MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper

From the Super Mario Wiki

Blooper[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.

Oppose[edit]

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.
  2. Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
  3. Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
  4. Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Vommack
  1. Mario (talk) The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid.
Fandro
  1. Stonehill (talk) ...which makes this vote invalid too.

Comments[edit]

I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. Mario Green.pngKaBoom! 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT)

@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. Mario Green.pngKaBoom! 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT)