Talk:Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
==Is this correct?===
==Is this correct?===


In the article says "Imajin's strength was transferred to Mario in Super Mario 64" this is not correct or  it is? {{User:Luigi 128|I nver hear this before.}}
In the article says "Imajin's strength was transferred to Mario in Super Mario 64" this is not correct or  it is? {{User:Luigi 128/sig|I nver hear this before.}}

Revision as of 20:00, February 27, 2009

Should we make articles for Imajin, Mama, Papa, and Lina? Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions·) Paper Jorge was here at... 18:55, 29 September 2006 (EDT)

There's not much information on them, and they're not exactly Mario charecters.
- Yoshi Master

Any information about them should be included in this article. As Yoshi Mastar said, they are not Marioverse characters. However, since Doki Doki Panic was the template used for Super Mario Bros. 2, the game has a place at this wiki. -- Son of Suns
Didn't they appear in Super Mario All-Stars? Paper Jorge
No. -- Son of Suns
Ok. I think I remember seeig them but oh well. Paper Jorge
Shouldn't we just delete this game?? It has nothing to do with the Marioverse. The SMB2 article mentioned enough info about this game. Glitchmansig.PNG Glitchman (talk · contribs) Glitchmansig.PNG
You'd want to merge it rather than just delete all of it. Despite the fact that the game doesn't have anything to do with the fictional side of the... "Marioverse" <-- really a subjective term if you ask me... Anyway, the game plays a big role in the actual history of the Mario series. So, keep this information on the Wiki, but I'm not saying it should have it's own article. The section on the SMB2 article pales in comparison to this. Stumpers! 23:24, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
Erm, maybe that's a good idea. Glitchmansig.PNG Glitchman (talk · contribs) Glitchmansig.PNG

Completely unrelated

Heh, check that out. Mama - Luigi. Binks 03:31, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

Hehe.  Caps Lock LORD 10:26, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
rofl Super-YoshiMust...eat...sig...Talk? C???

Is this article even needed?

What does it have to do with Mario? It's not a "Japanese Version" of Super Mario Bros. 2. It's more like the original basis of what later became known as "Super Mario USA" in Japan. So yes, there was an SMB2 in Japan, entilted "USA". It looks like most of the Mario info is already in the Super Mario Bros. 2 article, so do we need this one? Marcelagus (TCE)

Yes, the content is needed. Whether the article is needed is more of a gray area. I could see this page being merged with Super Mario Bros. 2 in a history section. Like you said, SMB2 has MOST of the information seen here, but not all of it, so we'd want to rectify that should we decide to merge. Stumpers! 11:41, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Is this correct?=

In the article says "Imajin's strength was transferred to Mario in Super Mario 64" this is not correct or it is? Luigi's battle stanceLUIGI 128Luigi's battle stanceI nver hear this before.See the Crazy Interviews!!!