MarioWiki talk:Featured articles/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
(Sub-pages) |
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
they should be added. This page is way to long. {{User:Max2/sig}} | they should be added. This page is way to long. {{User:Max2/sig}} | ||
:They could be. I think Wayoshi was going to take care of that this weekend. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] |
Revision as of 14:59, September 6, 2007
No more peer reviews
After the peer reviews feature has been removed, how will articles now be nominated? Completely after the old system? Or will there be changes? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 06:01, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
- Obviously asked this before seeing this. This page is in hiatus until that system starts if approved. Wa TC@Y 16:22, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
Jump Starting The FAs Again
Moved to Mariowiki:Proposals/Archive#FAs Reback
OK guys, I'm going to implement the new system, inspired from Uncyclopedia, this coming week. Eventually the old system will come into play at the end, but qualifications will be necessary before being able to be nominated. Wa TC@Y 23:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
- So what will happen exactly? I guess many are confused now. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 06:55, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
Reviews
How do we keep track of reviews? And what happens when two reviewers give an article a high score? ♥♪!? 17:18, 28 July 2007 (EDT)
I think its explained in MarioWiki: PAIR to some extent. -- Sir Grodus
- If all happen well, it will be (re)featured.
Yoshi
Didn't the Yoshi article pass the PAIR reviews? Talk: Yoshi has reviews over 18 by both reviewers. Does it get featured now? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:49, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
- For a week I have been mostly out of commission due to vacation, but now it needs to be nominated as before. Momentarily I'll set it up. Wa TC@Y 13:01, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
Explain, please
These Reviews are very complex to me. Can someone explain it clearly for me? My Bloody Valentine Anyone?
Strong?
What's with these phrases like "Strong Support" and "Very Strong Oppose"? Do they matter in any way? Should they even be allowed? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 11:39, 5 September 2007 (EDT)
- It's another one of those Wikipedia customs, suggesting that a weak support/oppose can easily be turned around with improvement and a strong support/oppose will stay. Either way, I don't think we need that here – a support is a support and an oppose is an oppose, no matter how weak or strong. Wa TC@Y 11:52, 5 September 2007 (EDT)
Uhm Who
Some people aren't putting their signature. How are we supposed to know who opposed/supported and tell if it counts if we don't know who opposed/supported? User:Fixitup
- We'll simply remove all unsigned votes, it's their fault not putting their signature. We don't need additional checking of every edit in the history. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 07:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
Sub-pages
they should be added. This page is way to long. Max2 (talk)
- They could be. I think Wayoshi was going to take care of that this weekend. -- Son of Suns