MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Sir Grodus: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... {{User|Fawfulfury65}}

Revision as of 23:55, July 25, 2010

Sir Grodus

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Booderdash (talk) Almost just as bad as the Shadow Queen article, with incorrect grammar, lack of images compared to the rather long and rambling descriptions, and Super Paper Mario section is WAY too short and can DEFINITLY be expanded... Some trivia also seems to be false but I'm not sure.
  2. KS3 (talk) Per all.

Keep Featured Article Status

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

I think the number of images are just fine, TBH with you. But there's a tense tag, and I agree with that. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I'll go through and put it all in present tense soon, maybe tomorrow... Fawfulfury65 (talk)