Talk:Chomp Keeper: Difference between revisions
Green Star (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Green Star (talk | contribs) (The user who created this article was last active six years ago, as far as I know, so no use asking him first.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Saving this Article== | ==Saving this Article== | ||
Might think I’m rushing it after learning the difference between NPCs being worthy of their own articles or not, but I am actually doubting the quality of the article - and I mean absolutely no offense to anyone, but the article doesn’t mention anything about where she’s found, whether or not she provides any actual information, actually focusing a lot more on her pets than herself. Any ideas, anything we can add? {{User:The Mansion/sig}} 14:22, October 26, 2020 (EDT) | Might think I’m rushing it after learning the difference between NPCs being worthy of their own articles or not, but I am actually doubting the quality of the article - and I mean absolutely no offense to anyone, but the article doesn’t mention anything about where she’s found, whether or not she provides any actual information, actually focusing a lot more on her pets than herself. Any ideas, anything we can add? {{User:The Mansion/sig}} 14:22, October 26, 2020 (EDT) | ||
==Necessary?== | |||
{{TPP}} | |||
In all honesty, this article does not seem necessary to me. Not only is the name conjectural, the character seems simply too minor to receive her own article. The fact that she simply owns these pets does not seem to be enough to warrant this. | |||
When I first saw this article, it focused mainly on her pets and their descriptions. However, they already have their own articles. Even when I fixed this, half of the article still focuses mostly on her pets. Her only real purpose seems to be informing, or at least hinting, toward how to calm them down. The only other things to note would be her appearance and other irrelevant information. I say we delete this article, as the information needed already exists within the [[Chain Chomplet]] and [[Chain Chomp]] articles respectively. | |||
Even if the article is kept, we should probably change the name, due to it being conjectural anyway. | |||
'''Proposer:''' [[User:The Mansion|The Mansion]] ([[User talk:The Mansion|talk]])<br> | |||
'''Deadline:''' May 10, 2021, 23:59 GMT | |||
===Delete=== | |||
#{{user|The Mansion}} - Per my reasoning above. | |||
===Keep=== | |||
Revision as of 10:38, April 26, 2021
Is there any particular reason for this title to be lowercase? --
™ The 'Shroom 16:44, 28 December 2016 (EST)
- The name in the article is proper, so... nope.
17:16, 28 December 2016 (EST)
Saving this Article
Might think I’m rushing it after learning the difference between NPCs being worthy of their own articles or not, but I am actually doubting the quality of the article - and I mean absolutely no offense to anyone, but the article doesn’t mention anything about where she’s found, whether or not she provides any actual information, actually focusing a lot more on her pets than herself. Any ideas, anything we can add? 
Green Star 14:22, October 26, 2020 (EDT)
Necessary?
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Saturday, May 18, 2024, 02:10 GMT
In all honesty, this article does not seem necessary to me. Not only is the name conjectural, the character seems simply too minor to receive her own article. The fact that she simply owns these pets does not seem to be enough to warrant this.
When I first saw this article, it focused mainly on her pets and their descriptions. However, they already have their own articles. Even when I fixed this, half of the article still focuses mostly on her pets. Her only real purpose seems to be informing, or at least hinting, toward how to calm them down. The only other things to note would be her appearance and other irrelevant information. I say we delete this article, as the information needed already exists within the Chain Chomplet and Chain Chomp articles respectively.
Even if the article is kept, we should probably change the name, due to it being conjectural anyway.
Proposer: The Mansion (talk)
Deadline: May 10, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Delete
- The Mansion (talk) - Per my reasoning above.
