Talk:Armored Harriers

Is it exactly nessicary to have to seperate images for them that are hardly different? Plus they're bad qaulity. HyperToad@Armored Harriers

Better quality would be nice, but I don't think we should have an image of only one of them; we should either have both together or keep it with two separate. YELLOWYOSHI398

They appear in the Tattle Log separately, their shoe color is different. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:00, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

My theory on why they're only number 10

Maybe they got up to level 10, but wouldn't or couldn't meet any of Grubba's conditions after that. --Kahran042 11:36, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

• Couldn't it theoretically just be that they are one of the newer contenders and started advancing the ranks late, and just got stuck one rank below one particular fighter that is able to beat them consistently? Being rank 10 does not mean you have fought all 9 of the top-ranked fighters yet, so the page's assumption that all 9 had to have a way to beat him is incorrect. And this seems to make a lot more sense than randomly becoming unable to meet fight conditions. -Jabbernaut

Superguard

I've figured out out that superguarding defends against the Armored Harriers, but it doesn't counter the attack. Should this fact be put in the article? - User:J-Yoshi64

Revenge

They actually revenge after the Shellshockers, not the Tiny Spinies. At least it's so in the PAL version... --What's my name? 01:48, 6 July 2012 (EDT)

Ditto for the North American version, just played that fight a few minutes ago and it was indeed the Shellshockers.--174.96.169.116 23:45, 18 March 2014 (EDT)